Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Stimulating the Lip Motor Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: June 14, 2014
Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation
Bence Laczó1, Andrea Antal2, Holger Rothkegel3
1Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effectively enhance leg motor cortex excitability. Both methods show comparable effects, with tDCS providing longer-lasting results than tRNS.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Neuromodulation
Background:
- Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is known to increase excitability in the hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1).
- The efficacy of tRNS on the leg motor cortex remains less understood compared to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of tRNS and tDCS in modulating the excitability of the leg motor cortex.
- To investigate the duration and magnitude of cortical excitability changes induced by these non-invasive brain stimulation techniques.
Main Methods:
- Ten healthy subjects participated in separate experimental sessions.
- Stimulation protocols included anodal tDCS, cathodal tDCS, tRNS, and sham stimulation, each lasting 10 minutes at 2 mA intensity.
- Motor cortical excitability was assessed using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) measured via single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
Main Results:
- Both tRNS and anodal tDCS significantly increased MEP amplitude, indicating enhanced motor cortex excitability.
- Anodal tDCS resulted in a sustained increase in corticospinal excitability for up to 60 minutes post-stimulation.
- tRNS produced an immediate effect lasting approximately 40 minutes, while cathodal tDCS did not yield statistically significant changes in MEP amplitude.
Conclusions:
- The leg motor cortex, despite its deeper cortical location, is responsive to weak transcranial electrical stimulation.
- Anodal tDCS and tRNS demonstrate comparable efficacy in modulating leg motor cortex excitability.
- The findings suggest potential therapeutic applications for both tDCS and tRNS in conditions affecting the leg motor system.
More Related Videos
07:47Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function
Published on: February 4, 2016
11:11Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: September 23, 2017