Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Independent absorbed-dose calculation using the Monte Carlo algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Akihiro Haga1, Taiki Magome, Shigeharu Takenaka
1Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. haga-haga@umin.ac.jp.
Independent Monte Carlo (MC) calculations for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) show excellent agreement with treatment planning systems, especially in high-dose regions. Differences in low-dose regions may stem from algorithm variations, useful for quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Computational Dosimetry
Background:
- Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is a sophisticated radiation therapy technique.
- Accurate dose calculation is critical for effective VMAT treatment planning.
- Independent verification of dose calculations ensures patient safety and treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare absorbed dose calculations using a Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm against a superposition/convolution (SC) algorithm for VMAT.
- To evaluate the accuracy of MC-based dose recalculations for various cancer treatment sites.
- To assess the utility of independent MC dose calculations in VMAT quality assurance.
Main Methods:
- Treatment plans generated with the SC algorithm (SmartArc, Pinnacle) were recalculated using the X-ray Voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) algorithm (Monaco).
- Validation was performed using phantom irradiations. Independent dose calculations were conducted for 15 patients across prostate, lung, head and neck, rectal, and esophageal cancer sites.
- Dose comparisons focused on the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR), with analysis of discrepancies against measurement data.
Main Results:
- Excellent agreement (<1.5% difference at isocenter) was observed between SC and XVMC algorithms for VMAT phantom calculations.
- Independent absorbed dose calculations showed strong agreement, with mean PTV dose differences within 2.0% for all patients.
- Significant differences were noted in mean OAR doses, particularly a smaller calculated rectal dose in Monaco for prostate cancer patients.
Conclusions:
- MC and SC algorithms demonstrate comparable accuracy in high-dose regions for VMAT.
- Discrepancies in low-dose regions may be attributed to intrinsic MC variations, modeling, or CT-to-density table differences.
- Independent MC dose calculations are valuable for commissioning and quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
07:31Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Clearance
In the one-compartment open model for intravenous (IV) bolus administration, clearance is estimated by dividing the elimination rate by the plasma drug concentration. This equation leverages the elimination rate constant and the apparent...
Compartment Models: Single-Compartment Model