Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Ultrahigh Resolution Mouse Optical Coherence Tomography to Aid Intraocular Injection in Retinal Gene Therapy Research
Published on: November 2, 2018
Hyaluronic acid gel distribution pattern in periocular area with high-resolution ultrasound imaging
Alice S Goh1, Jocelyne C Kohn, Daniel B Rootman
1Jules Stein Eye Institute, Division of Orbital, Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Background:
High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) is a useful tool in defining anatomic and dynamic soft tissue relationships in the periocular area. It also allows visualization of hyaluronic acid (HA) gel within the soft tissue.
Objectives:
The authors investigate the difference in the distribution pattern between 2 HA fillers in the periocular tissue using HRUS.
Methods:
The charts of 10 patients who underwent periocular injection using HA gel filler and were subsequently examined with HRUS were reviewed. Half of the patients (n = 5) were treated with Restylane-L (Medicis Aesthetics, Inc, Scottsdale, Arizona) and the remaining 5 with Belotero Balance (Merz Aesthetics, Inc, San Mateo, California). Ultrasonographic evaluation (Logiq p6; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Washington) was performed before and immediately after HA filler injection.
Results:
The HA appears as a hypoechoic image within the soft tissue plane on HRUS. Restylane-L filler formed a localized hypoechoic image within the tissue, with some spread into bubbles or pearl-like configuration. Belotero Balance spread more widely into the tissue plane and diffused into an elongated or spindle-shaped hypoechoic image.
Conclusions:
Our preliminary data suggest that HA gel fillers with differing production technologies show distinct spread and distribution patterns in the periocular tissues on HRUS examination.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

