Attractive interactions among intermediate filaments determine network mechanics in vitro
Paul Pawelzyk1, Norbert Mücke2, Harald Herrmann3
1Institute for Mechanical Process Engineering and Mechanics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Plos One
|April 3, 2014
Summary
Mechanical properties of intermediate filament (IF) networks, like K8/K18 and vimentin, were studied. Two binding sites were identified, one for high elastic modulus and another for strain stiffening, crucial for IF network mechanics.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Materials Science
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Intermediate filaments (IFs) are crucial cytoskeletal components.
- Their mechanical and structural properties are vital for cell and tissue integrity.
- Understanding IF network mechanics informs disease research and biomaterial development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the mechanical and structural properties of K8/K18 and vimentin intermediate filament (IF) networks.
- To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying IF network mechanics, particularly strain stiffening and elastic modulus.
- To identify the roles of different filament domains and interactions in network behavior.
Main Methods:
- Bulk mechanical rheometry to measure network properties.
- Optical microrheology techniques, including diffusing wave spectroscopy and multiple particle tracking.
- Analysis of filament assembly, persistence length, and network mesh size.
- Investigation of the effects of nonionic surfactants and tailless mutants.
Main Results:
- IF networks exhibit high elastic modulus (G0) and pronounced strain stiffening even without external crosslinkers.
- G0 shows weak concentration dependency (G0 ∼ c(0.5 ± 0.1)) attributed to strong attractive interactions.
- Strain stiffening is suppressed by surfactants and absent in tailless mutants, indicating the importance of tail domains.
- A weaker binding site in the central rod contributes to high G0, while a stronger site in the tail domain facilitates strain stiffening.
- Vimentin shows less strain stiffening than K8/K18 due to electrostatic repulsion.
Conclusions:
- Two distinct binding sites govern IF network mechanics: one for high elastic modulus and another for strain stiffening.
- Hydrophobic interactions in the central rod and tail domains are critical for IF network mechanical integrity and responsiveness.
- Understanding these mechanisms provides insights into cytoskeletal mechanics and potential therapeutic targets.
Related Concept Videos
Formation of Intermediate Filaments
3.1K
Intermediate filaments are cytoskeletal proteins with higher tensile strength and flexibility than microfilaments and microtubules. Unlike the other two cytoskeletal proteins, intermediate filament formation lacks the enzymatic activity to hydrolyze nucleotides like ATP and GTP to generate energy for polymerization. Therefore, the formation of intermediate filaments is multistep self-assembly. The involvement of any accessory proteins in intermediate filament formation has not yet been...
3.1K
The Structure of Intermediate Filaments
4.5K
The intermediate filaments are one of three widely studied cytoskeletal filaments. They are so named as their diameter (10 nm) is in between that of microfilaments (7 nm) and the microtubules (25 nm). These filaments are highly stable and can remain intact when exposed to high salt concentrations and detergents. These filaments are responsible for providing stability and mechanical support to the cells. They also help in cell adhesion and maintaining tissue integrity.
Intermediate...
Intermediate...
4.5K
Disassembly of Intermediate Filaments
2.0K
Intermediate filaments (IFs) do not undergo spontaneous disassembly. Enzymes, kinases, and phosphatases add and remove phosphates from specific sites to regulate their disassembly. The IF concentration in the cytoplasm also regulates the disassembly. If the concentration crosses a threshold, it activates the protein kinases in the vicinity, allowing the phosphorylation of IFs.
Keratin proteins, found at the cell periphery near cell junctions, undergo a cycle of assembly and disassembly. In Type...
Keratin proteins, found at the cell periphery near cell junctions, undergo a cycle of assembly and disassembly. In Type...
2.0K
Assembly of Cytoskeletal Filaments
17.4K
Cytoskeletal filaments are polymeric forms of smaller protein subunits. However, individual cytoskeletal filaments may easily disassemble or associate with other similar filaments to form rigid structures. Microfilaments, made of actin monomers, rely on actin-binding proteins to form bundles and create networks of individual actin filaments. Microtubules rely on microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) to form sturdy cylindrical structures. However, the proteins involved in forming complex...
17.4K
Formation of Higher-order Actin Filaments
2.8K
The polymerization of G-actin monomers into filamentous F-actin is a multi-step process. Once the F-actins are formed, they can bundle together in different arrangements to form higher-order networks and regulate cellular functions. Common examples include the formation of lamellipodia and filopodia at the cell's leading edge by actin reorganization in a migrating cell. The microvilli on the brush border epithelial cells are also formed through the F-actin network.
The high-order actin...
The high-order actin...
2.8K
Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments
5.7K
The cytoskeleton is a complex dynamic structure performing varied functions based on cellular requirements. The adaptability of the individual filaments in the cytoskeleton determines their ability to perform various functions within the cell. It can undergo rapid reorganization during processes like cell division or remain stable for several hours as in the interphase. The adaptability of these filaments depends on stringent regulatory mechanisms. The microfilament and microtubules of the...
5.7K


