Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

06:16
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
5.8K
Enhancing public involvement in assistive technology design research.
Tracey Williamson1, Laurence Kenney, Anthony T Barker
1School of Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work and Social Science, University of Salford , Salford, Greater Manchester , UK .
Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology
|April 18, 2014
Summary
Public involvement significantly improved assistive technology design and research team attitudes. This case study highlights the value of co-design in rehabilitation technology, addressing a weak evidence base.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Engineering
- Assistive Technology Research
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Public involvement in research is increasingly encouraged but its impact on assistive technology (AT) design requires further appraisal.
- Guidance exists for good practice in public involvement, yet detailed accounts of its application and outcomes in AT research are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the implementation of public involvement guidance in AT research.
- To assess the impact of public involvement on research teams, participants, and the design of devices and trials.
- To contribute a detailed case study to the evidence base on public involvement in AT design.
Main Methods:
- A case study approach was used, focusing on the development of a functional electrical stimulation device.
- Critical reflection and within-project evaluation methods were employed.
- Individual and group interviews were conducted with lay members of a user advisory group and research team members.
Main Results:
- Research team members reported positive impacts on device and study designs due to public involvement.
- Public participants experienced enhanced confidence, skills, self-esteem, and satisfaction, and contributed to improving care.
- A challenge was identified in engaging the public in the dissemination phase after study completion.
Conclusions:
- Public involvement significantly enhanced the design of an assistive technology, making it more fit for purpose.
- Research team members developed more positive attitudes towards public involvement after observing its potential firsthand.
- This case study provides a valuable account of public involvement in AT design, strengthening the limited evidence base and underscoring the need for active engagement in rehabilitation research.

