Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting
Published on: April 8, 2022
Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ
R Jaramillo1, R Santos, P Lázaro
1*Associate Professor, School of Dentistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain; Lecturer, Department of Periodontology and Implants, University of Seville, Seville, Spain. †Lecturer, Master's Degree, Periodontology and Implants, University of Seville; Private Practice, Periodontal and Dental Implants, Madrid, Spain. ‡Lecturer, Master's Degree, Periodontology and Implants, University of Seville; Private Practice, Dental Implant and Oral Surgery, Cádiz, Spain. §Lecturer, Department of Dentistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain; Lecturer, Department of Periodontology and Implants, University of Seville, Seville, Spain. ‖Full Professor, Department of Dentistry, University of Seville; Lecturer, Master's Degree, Periodontology and Implants, University of Seville; Dean of the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain. ¶Full-time Lecturer, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Seville; Lecturer, Master's Degree, Applied Biostatistics for the Health Sciences, University of Seville, Seville, Spain. #Lecturer, Master's Degree, Periodontology and Implants, University of Seville; Private Practice, Periodontal and Dental Implant, Málaga, Spain.
Objective:
Comparing reliability of Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ in implant stability measurement, and assessing whether their measurements are comparable.
Materials And Method:
Implant stability was measured with both devices on 58 implants in 15 patients. Six measurements were completed with each device with 2 different transducers (3 measurements with each transducer), that is, 12 measurements for each implant.
Results:
Mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) value with Osstell ISQ was 72.59, 72.47, and 73.17 in the first measurements, respectively. With Osstell Mentor, the results were 72.43, 72.60, and 73.26, respectively; mean ranges were 3.37, 3.60, and 3.75, respectively. However, mean value with Osstell ISQ and Osstell Mentor was 72.87 and 72.04, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.98. This means an almost perfect degree of concordance between both devices.
Conclusions:
Resonance frequency analysis systems in Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ show almost perfect reproducibility and repeatability.
Related Concept Videos
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations
Mass Analyzers: Common Types
Mass Analyzers: Overview
Raman Spectroscopy Instrumentation: Overview
The monochromatic laser source, typically using visible or near-infrared radiation, generates a highly focused beam of light. This light interacts with the molecules of the sample, scattering some of the light. Liquid and gaseous samples are usually tested in ordinary glass capillaries, while solids can be analyzed as powders packed in capillaries or as potassium...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
The atomizer used in AAS can be either a flame atomizer or an...

