Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Evaluating international research ethics capacity development: an empirical approach
Joseph Ali1, Nancy E Kass, Nelson K Sewankambo
1Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics (USA).
This study introduces a new framework to evaluate international research ethics training programs, particularly those in resource-limited settings. The goal is to assess training impact and identify success factors for better funding and curriculum development.
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Bioethics Education
- Research Integrity
Background:
- The Fogarty International Center (NIH-FIC) has funded international research ethics education for 13 years, with significant investment in sub-Saharan Africa.
- A lack of comprehensive evaluation frameworks hinders the assessment of these vital training programs.
- Understanding training impact and success predictors is crucial for informed decision-making and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present an original conceptual framework and methodology for evaluating research ethics training programs.
- To assess the inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes of these programs in resource-limited settings.
- To inform curricular improvements and funding priorities for international research ethics education.
Main Methods:
- Development of a novel conceptual framework for program evaluation.
- Creation of a specific data collection tool for assessing training components.
- Detailed methodology for analyzing training inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes.
Main Results:
- The paper introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework and data collection tool.
- The proposed methods allow for a detailed assessment of research ethics training programs.
- This work addresses a gap in the literature regarding the evaluation of international bioethics training.
Conclusions:
- The developed framework and tools provide a systematic approach to evaluating research ethics training.
- This evaluation is essential for optimizing training investments and improving outcomes for trainees and programs.
- The findings support evidence-based decision-making in global health research ethics education.
More Related Videos
08:10Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy NIRS Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa
Published on: February 2, 2018
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Ethics and Bioethics
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...