Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion
Published on: September 25, 2014
The Relation Between Testing Environment and Baseline Performance in Child and Adolescent Concussion Assessment
Christopher G Vaughan1, Elyssa H Gerst2, Maegan D Sady3
1Division of Pediatric Neuropsychology, Children's National Health System and George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA cvaughan@childrensnational.org.
Standardized concussion baseline assessments yield similar cognitive performance and symptom reporting in group versus individual settings for children. This highlights the importance of consistent administration and supervision for accurate concussion recovery decisions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric neurology
- Sports medicine
- Cognitive neuroscience
Background:
- Previous studies indicated disparities in cognitive performance for concussion baseline assessments between group and individual settings.
- Accurate baseline data is crucial for clinical decisions regarding post-concussion cognitive and symptom recovery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if standardized testing procedures eliminate performance differences in cognitive assessments for concussion between group and individual settings.
- To compare cognitive performance, symptom reporting, and invalid performance rates between group and individual baseline concussion assessments.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study (Level of evidence, 3) involving 939 participants (aged 5-18 years).
- Participants were matched for age, sex, and ADHD status, with 313 tested individually and 626 in a group setting.
- Concussion baseline assessments utilized the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) and the Multimodal Assessment of Cognition & Symptoms for Children (MACS).
Main Results:
- No significant differences in cognitive performance (Learning and Memory, Response Speed, Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Visual Motor Speed, Reaction Time) or symptom reporting were observed between group and individual settings.
- Rates of invalid performance did not differ between settings for the overall cohort.
- An interaction effect for invalid performance was noted in younger children (5-12 years) with ADHD, showing higher rates in group settings.
Conclusions:
- Standardized administration procedures and trained personnel result in comparable outcomes for group and individual baseline concussion assessments.
- Observed prior differences between settings may stem from variations in test administration and supervision, not the setting itself.
- Emphasizes the critical role of standardized procedures and adequate supervision in baseline concussion evaluations.
More Related Videos
11:32A Neuroscientific Approach to the Examination of Concussions in Student-Athletes
Published on: December 8, 2014
07:02An Investigation of the Effects of Sports-related Concussion in Youth Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Head Impact Telemetry System
Published on: January 12, 2011