Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Early phase trial designs and endpoints for targeted therapies in rare genotype subsets
1From the Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Abstract:
The primary goal of phase I dose-finding trials has been historically to understand the safety profile of a new treatment/regimen and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for further investigation in a specific tumor type. These designs hinged on the assumption that the highest safe dose is also likely to be the most efficacious dose. In the current era of stratified medicine and targeted therapies, these assumptions and designs are quickly becoming obsolete. Newer approaches to dose-finding designs are emerging with a focus on not just safety, but also an efficacy (clinical- or biomarker-based) measure to guide the determination of the "optimal" dose (not necessarily the MTD) model, as opposed to rule-based designs. These designs allow for flexibility in trial conduct, with improved precision in estimating the dose to take forward for further testing, patient selection/enrichment strategies to maximize the chance of therapeutic effect, and expansion cohorts to further understand the safety/efficacy of the agent and patient subsets most likely to benefit from the agent under investigation. Although advances in technology have enabled the possibility of using these newer approaches, the acceptance and integration of these approaches in practice can only be accelerated if it is developed in concert with a clinical paradigm.
Insights
Traditional phase I trials focused on safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Modern oncology trials are shifting towards adaptive designs that incorporate efficacy to find the optimal dose, not just the MTD.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Design
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Phase I trials traditionally aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on safety.
- This MTD-based approach is becoming outdated with advances in targeted therapies and stratified medicine.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore newer dose-finding trial designs that integrate both safety and efficacy measures.
- To identify the optimal therapeutic dose, rather than solely the MTD, for targeted patient populations.
Main Methods:
- Review of evolving dose-finding methodologies in clinical trials.
- Discussion of adaptive designs incorporating clinical or biomarker-based efficacy endpoints.
- Emphasis on model-based versus rule-based design approaches.
Main Results:
- Newer designs offer greater flexibility and precision in dose estimation.
- These adaptive designs facilitate patient enrichment strategies for enhanced therapeutic effect.
- Expansion cohorts aid in understanding agent efficacy in specific patient subsets.
Conclusions:
- Modern dose-finding designs are essential for optimizing targeted cancer therapies.
- Integrating efficacy alongside safety is crucial for identifying the optimal dose.
- Technological advancements support these novel trial designs, but clinical paradigm alignment is key for adoption.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...

