Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Implications of off-label use: An example from the final results of an observational cohort study on Intrinsa®
Vicki Osborne1, Deborah Layton2, Saad Aw Shakir2
1Drug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Southampton, UK School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK Vicki.osborne@dsru.org.
Introduction:
Off-label use is where a medicinal product is used for a medical purpose not in accordance with the authorised product information. Intrinsa® is a transdermal testosterone patch, which is indicated for use in hypoactive sexual desire disorder in bilaterally oophorectomised and hysterectomised women receiving concomitant estrogen therapy.
Objectives:
To describe the utilization characteristics of patients prescribed testosterone patch (Intrinsa®) and to assess, where possible, if the product is being used according to the authorised product information.
Study Design:
Patients identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by general practitioners for Intrinsa® between March 2007 and August 2010. Postal questionnaires were sent to general practitioners six months following the date of the first prescription for Intrinsa® for each patient, requesting information including patient demographics and drug utilization.
Main Outcome Measures:
Menopausal status and use of concomitant estrogen therapy.
Results:
The final cohort consisted of 3073 patients; the majority were females (3017, 98.2%). The most commonly reported indication was hypoactive sexual desire disorder in 2324 female patients (77.0%). Only 43.5% female patients (n = 1313) were reported to have been hysterectomised and bilaterally oophorectomised. For 1029 (34.1%) female patients there was no evidence that the patient was using concomitant estrogen therapy. Overall, only 643 patients (20.9%) in the cohort were being prescribed Intrinsa® according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Conclusions:
Evidence obtained solely from clinical trials might not be generalisable where off-label prescribing occurs in real-life, so evidence from post-marketing observational studies is important to provide complimentary data on a product's safety and effectiveness.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
06:19Author Spotlight: A Novel Protocol for Intracameral Injections to Enhance Precision in Rodent Ophthalmology
Published on: May 31, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...