Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017
Systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Francisco E Vera-Badillo1, Arnoud J Templeton1, Ignacio Duran2
1Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Context:
Clinical data supporting the use of targeted agents for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are based predominantly on patients with clear cell histology. Little is known about the efficacy of these drugs in non-clear cell variants.
Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of different clear cell RCC (ccRCC)-approved targeted agents among patients with non-ccRCC compared with ccRCC.
Evidence Acquisition:
We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases to identify publications evaluating the outcomes of patients with non-ccRCC treated with targeted agents approved for treatment of ccRCC. Patients with sarcomatoid variant RCC were excluded from the main analysis but were evaluated as an independent cohort. End points of interest were response rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS). Where possible, data were pooled in a meta-analysis. For studies of unselected patients with RCC, the outcomes of patients with non-ccRCC histology were compared with ccRCC. In exploratory analyses, outcomes of non-ccRCC with nonapproved agents were assessed.
Evidence Synthesis:
A total of 49 studies comprising 7771 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 1244 patients (16.0%) had non-ccRCC, 6300 (83.1%) had ccRCC, and 227 (2.9%) had sarcomatoid tumours. The overall response rate for non-ccRCC with targeted agents was 10.5%. In studies directly comparing non-ccRCC and ccRCC, there were significantly lower response rates for non-ccRCC (odds ratio for response: 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.68; p<0.001). For non-ccRCC treated with targeted agents, median PFS and OS were 7.4 and 13.4 mo, respectively; for patients with ccRCC, these were 10.5 mo and 15.7 mo, respectively (p value for difference<0.001 for both parameters).
Conclusions:
Patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) have significantly lower response rates and poorer median progression-free survival and overall survival than those with ccRCC. The optimal treatment of patients with non-ccRCC remains unclear and warrants further study.
Patient Summary:
Systemic treatments for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tend to be significantly less effective for non-clear cell RCC, with lower response rates and worse progression-free survival and overall survival when compared with clear cell RCC. Optimal therapy remains unclear and warrants further study.
Insights
Targeted therapies show lower efficacy in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) compared to clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Further research is needed to determine optimal treatment strategies for non-ccRCC patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Science
Background:
- Clinical data for targeted agents in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) predominantly include clear cell histology (ccRCC).
- Limited evidence exists on the efficacy of these agents in non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC) variants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of targeted agents approved for ccRCC in patients with non-ccRCC versus ccRCC.
- To evaluate response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for non-ccRCC treated with ccRCC-approved agents.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of electronic databases for studies on non-ccRCC treated with targeted agents approved for ccRCC.
- Meta-analysis of pooled data where possible, comparing outcomes between non-ccRCC and ccRCC histologies.
- Exploratory analysis of non-ccRCC outcomes with non-approved agents and sarcomatoid variant RCC as a separate cohort.
Main Results:
- Analysis included 7771 patients (16.0% non-ccRCC, 83.1% ccRCC).
- Non-ccRCC demonstrated significantly lower response rates (10.5% vs. ccRCC), median PFS (7.4 vs. 10.5 months), and median OS (13.4 vs. 15.7 months) compared to ccRCC (p<0.001 for all).
- Odds ratio for response in non-ccRCC vs. ccRCC was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.40-0.68).
Conclusions:
- Patients with non-ccRCC experience significantly inferior outcomes (response rates, PFS, OS) compared to ccRCC when treated with targeted agents approved for ccRCC.
- The optimal therapeutic approach for non-ccRCC remains undetermined and requires further investigation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...

