Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026
08:27
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
6.1K
Us versus Them in Context: Meta-Analysis as a Tool for Geotemporal Trends in Intergroup Relations
Judy Y Tan1, Tania B Huedo-Medina1, Carter A Lennon1
1Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, United States.
International Journal of Conflict and Violence
|June 10, 2014
Summary
Cross-national studies offer insights into group behavior and conflict. Meta-analytic methods can bridge gaps in understanding intergroup conflict by analyzing variations across time and geography.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Conflict Studies
- Cross-Cultural Research
Background:
- Growing availability of international studies on group psychology, behavior, conflict, and violence.
- Limited cross-national comparisons hinder understanding of intergroup conflict's historical causes and development.
- Existing comparative approaches lack comprehensive analysis of global variations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review statistical methods for comparative analyses in intergroup research.
- To identify how meta-analytic methods can address limitations in current comparative approaches.
- To explore the utility of meta-analysis in understanding group differences, conflict, and violence across diverse contexts.
Main Methods:
- Review of statistical methods for comparative analyses in intergroup research.
- Application of meta-analytic techniques to combine data from diverse studies.
- Exploration of structural-level moderators and temporal/geographical variations.
Main Results:
- Identified strengths and limitations of various statistical methods for intergroup research.
- Meta-analytic methods demonstrate potential to overcome limitations in comparative analyses.
- Meta-analysis can elucidate mechanisms linking temporal and geographical variations to group-based variables.
Conclusions:
- Meta-analytic methods are crucial for advancing cross-national understanding of intergroup conflict.
- These methods enhance the analysis of group differences, conflict, and violence.
- Structural-level moderators and variations in time and place significantly impact group dynamics.
More Related Videos
08:42Measurement of the Directional Information Flow in fNIRS-Hyperscanning Data using the Partial Wavelet Transform Coherence Method
Published on: September 3, 2021
2.9K
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
1.4K
Related Concept Videos
01:19Impact of Groups on Groups
343
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
343
04:49Robbers Cave
13.5K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
13.5K
01:31In- and Out-Groups
28.5K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
28.5K
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
77.8K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
77.8K
02:16Stereotype Content Model
13.0K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.0K
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K