Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

In Vivo Telemetry to Record Long-Term Cardiovascular Parameters, Temperature, and Activity in Spinal Cord Injury Rat Models
Published on: January 2, 2026
Refined assessment of blood pressure instability after spinal cord injury
Michèle Hubli1, Cameron M Gee1, Andrei V Krassioukov2
1International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;
Background:
This study determined whether the Autonomic Dysfunction Following Spinal Cord Injury (ADFSCI) questionnaire, a measure of self-reported frequency and severity of symptoms during hypo- and hypertensive episodes, correlates with blood pressure (BP) instability. In addition, test-retest reliability of the ADFSCI questionnaire was assessed.
Methods:
Thirty individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) (aged 42±12 years; level of lesion = C3-L1; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale = A-C; lesion duration = 1 month to 30 years after injury) participated in this study. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was used to assess BP instability. ABPM recorded systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and heart rate at 15-minute intervals during the daytime and 1-hour intervals during the nighttime. Test-retest reliability was performed by completion of the ADFSCI questionnaire on 2 occasions (i.e., 9±4 days in between).
Results:
Individuals with SCI who self-reported autonomic dysreflexia (AD) episodes showed significantly higher SBP coefficient of variation (CV) (14%) and more AD events (n = 11) than individuals who reported never having AD symptoms (CV = 9%; AD events = 1). Both the number of AD events over the 24-hour period and the BP variability (SBP CV) were significantly related to the patients' self-reported total AD score (rho = 0.522, P = 0.005; rho = 0.584, P = 0.001, respectively) and daily AD frequency (rho = 0.553, P = 0.003; rho = 0.586, P = 0.001, respectively). Conversely, no significant correlations existed between the number of hypotensive events over the 24-hour period and self-reported frequency and severity in the ADFSCI questionnaire.
Conclusions:
This study provides evidence that ABPM offers a strong clinical basis for documenting and understanding BP instability, such as AD, and related symptoms in individuals with SCI.
More Related Videos
09:19Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging for Assessment of Spinal Cord Blood Flow in Experimental Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: May 7, 2015
06:51Development of an Algorithm to Perform a Comprehensive Study of Autonomic Dysreflexia in Animals with High Spinal Cord Injury Using a Telemetry Device
Published on: July 29, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation