Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laetrile--an overview.

J H Price, J A Price

    The Journal of School Health
    |September 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Decades of research show Laetrile does not kill cancer cells, despite persistent misconceptions. This study examines the evidence, legal issues, and the role of health education in addressing the continued belief in Laetrile as a cancer cure.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effects of Wheat streak mosaic virus on Root Development and Water-Use Efficiency of Hard Red Winter Wheat.

    Plant disease·2019
    Same author

    Characterization and Epidemiological Significance of Potato Plants Grown from Seed Tubers Affected by Zebra Chip Disease.

    Plant disease·2019
    Same author

    Wheat Streak Mosaic: A Classic Case of Plant Disease Impact on Soil Water Content and Crop Water-Use Efficiency.

    Plant disease·2019
    Same author

    Satellite Remote Sensing of Wheat Infected by Wheat streak mosaic virus.

    Plant disease·2019
    Same author

    The etiology of adolescents' perceptions of their weight.

    Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
    Same author

    Estimates of future population.

    The Eugenics review·2011
    Same journal

    Response to Letter to the Editor, Re: Student Differences in a Social-Emotional Learning Program: Engagement and Individual Factors.

    The Journal of school health·2026
    Same journal

    Re: Student Differences in a Social-Emotional Learning Program: Engagement and Individual Factors.

    The Journal of school health·2026
    Same journal

    Understanding Multi-Victimization: Identifying Socioecological Supports Among Adolescents.

    The Journal of school health·2026
    Same journal

    Journal of School Health Transition and Research Priorities for 2026-2029.

    The Journal of school health·2026
    Same journal

    Student and Teacher Attitudes Toward a School-Based Firearm Injury Prevention Presentation in Washington State.

    The Journal of school health·2026
    Same journal

    Sense of School Belonging and School Reintegration for Students Hospitalized With Chronic or Complex Medical Diseases: Insights From a Grounded Theory Study.

    The Journal of school health·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Oncology
    • Pharmacology
    • Health Policy

    Background:

    • Laetrile, a controversial alternative cancer treatment, was theorized to work by selectively targeting cancer cells.
    • Despite its historical claims, scientific evidence supporting Laetrile's efficacy has been lacking for decades.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the historical theory of Laetrile's mode of action.
    • To examine the scientific evidence from animal studies regarding Laetrile's effect on cancer cells.
    • To explore the legal, socioeconomic, and educational aspects surrounding Laetrile's persistent use.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of studies on Laetrile's mode of action.
    • Analysis of animal research investigating Laetrile's anti-cancer effects.
    • Examination of legal, socioeconomic, and health education literature related to Laetrile.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Over 40 years of animal studies consistently demonstrated that Laetrile does not preferentially kill cancer cells.
    • Scientific evidence does not support the theory that Laetrile is an effective cancer treatment.
    • Misconceptions about Laetrile's efficacy persist despite contrary scientific findings.

    Conclusions:

    • Laetrile lacks scientific validation as a cancer treatment.
    • Addressing the persistent misconception of Laetrile's efficacy requires understanding its legal and socioeconomic implications.
    • Health education plays a crucial role in combating misinformation about alternative cancer therapies like Laetrile.