Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

05:34
5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
1.8K
Experience with retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy in bilateral Wilms tumor
Irene Isabel P Lim1, Joshua N Honeyman1, Elizabeth A Fialkowski1
1Division of Pediatric Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States.
Summary
The retroperitoneal approach for partial nephrectomy in children with bilateral Wilms tumors is as effective as the transabdominal method. This technique offers faster oral feeding resumption and reduced bowel injury risk.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Urologic Oncology
Background:
- Bilateral Wilms tumors require nephron-sparing surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
- The retroperitoneal approach for partial nephrectomy in this context has not been extensively studied.
- Potential benefits include isolated urine leaks, reduced bowel injury, and quicker diet resumption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of retroperitoneal versus transabdominal partial nephrectomy in pediatric patients with bilateral Wilms tumors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 14 pediatric patients (15 procedures) with bilateral Wilms tumors undergoing partial nephrectomy (1994-2014).
- Comparison of retroperitoneal (n=5) and transabdominal (n=10) approaches.
- Analysis of tumor characteristics (size, nephrometry score) and surgical outcomes (operative time, blood loss, complications, recurrence).
Main Results:
- Tumor characteristics and R0 resection rates were comparable between groups.
- Retroperitoneal approach showed a trend towards faster return to oral diet (p=0.08).
- One bowel enterotomy occurred in the transabdominal group; four recurrences were noted in the transabdominal group.
Conclusions:
- The retroperitoneal approach is a viable alternative to the transabdominal approach for partial nephrectomy in bilateral Wilms tumors.
- It offers comparable efficacy regarding intraoperative complications and oncologic outcomes.
- Key advantages include reduced bowel injury risk and faster postoperative feeding resumption.

