Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
Published on: September 7, 2018
Intra- and intervariability in beam data commissioning among water phantom scanning systems.
Yuichi Akino1, John P Gibbons, Daniel W Neck
1Indiana University School of Medicine. akino-radonc@umin.net.
Four commercial scanning systems showed high accuracy for radiotherapy beam data collection, with minimal differences between them. Selection should prioritize user preference and cost over minor technical variations.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Physics
- Radiation Oncology
Background:
- Accurate beam data acquisition is critical for radiotherapy treatment planning and dose calculation.
- Commercial scanning systems are available, but comparative studies are lacking due to cost and accessibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the intra- and intervariability of beam profiles measured by four commercial scanning systems.
- To assess the accuracy of these systems for radiotherapy beam data collection.
Main Methods:
- Four commercial beam scanning water phantom systems from different vendors were used.
- Systems were set up per vendor recommendations and used to measure beam parameters, including percent depth dose (PDD).
- Intra- and intervariability were assessed, with one system chosen as a reference for comparison.
Main Results:
- Intervariability in PDD was very small (SD < 0.12%) deeper than 1.5 cm, with systems showing nearly identical profiles.
- Differences within the 80% radiation field were within ±0.35% (average) and ±0.80% (maximum) compared to the reference system.
- Penumbrae region agreement (DTA) was less than 1 mm for dose differences exceeding ±1%.
- Intravariability in repeated PDD measurements was small (SD < 0.5%), except in the buildup region.
Conclusions:
- All four water phantom scanning systems demonstrated adequate accuracy for beam data collection, meeting typical clinical requirements (1% dose difference or 1 mm DTA).
- The selection of a scanning system should be based on factors such as user comfort, software/hardware preference, and financial considerations rather than minor performance differences.
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
06:33Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013