Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
Published on: July 27, 2022
Evaluation of Actical equations and thresholds to predict physical activity intensity in young children
Xanne Janssen1, Dylan Cliff, John Reilly
1a Interdisciplinary Educational Research Institute , University of Wollongong , Wollongong , Australia.
Insights
This study found that current Actical equations are inaccurate for measuring preschoolers' activity energy expenditure (AEE) across all intensities. However, specific cut-points are recommended for classifying sedentary behavior, light, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Exercise Science
- Biomedical Engineering
- Physical Activity Measurement
Background:
- Accurate measurement of physical activity energy expenditure (AEE) is crucial for understanding energy balance in children.
- Actical devices and their associated equations/cut-points are widely used but their validity in young children requires examination.
- Preschoolers exhibit unique movement patterns that may affect the accuracy of accelerometry-based measures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of Actical activity energy expenditure (AEE) equations and intensity cut-points in preschoolers.
- To compare the accuracy of different Actical cut-points and equations against criterion measures.
- To provide recommendations for accurate physical activity intensity classification in preschool children.
Main Methods:
- Forty preschoolers (4-6 years) underwent a ~150-minute room calorimeter protocol.
- Direct observation and Actical accelerometry were used to measure activity energy expenditure (AEE) and physical activity intensity.
- AEE and intensity were calculated using Actical equations and cut-points from Adolph, Evenson, Pfeiffer, and Puyau.
- Statistical analyses included paired sample t-tests and classification accuracy metrics (weighted kappas, sensitivity, specificity, ROC curves).
Main Results:
- The Pfeiffer equation significantly overestimated AEE during sedentary behavior and underestimated it during light-intensity physical activity.
- No significant differences were found between measured and predicted AEE during moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) using the Pfeiffer equation.
- The Adolph cut-point demonstrated superior accuracy in classifying sedentary behavior, light-intensity physical activity, and MVPA compared to other tested cut-points.
- Overall, Actical equations did not accurately estimate AEE across all intensity levels in preschoolers.
Conclusions:
- Current Actical equations lack precision for estimating overall AEE in preschool children.
- The Pfeiffer equation shows reasonable performance for classifying MVPA in this age group.
- Recommended cut-points for classifying sedentary behavior (≤6 counts·15s⁻¹), light-intensity physical activity (7–286 counts·15s⁻¹), and MVPA (≥287 counts·15s⁻¹) are proposed for preschoolers.
Abstract:
Abstract This study examined the validity of current Actical activity energy expenditure (AEE) equations and intensity cut-points in preschoolers using AEE and direct observation as criterion measures. Forty 4-6-year-olds (5.3 ± 1.0 years) completed a ~150-min room calorimeter protocol involving age-appropriate sedentary behaviours (SBs), light intensity physical activities (LPAs) and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activities (MVPAs). AEE and/or physical activity intensity were calculated using Actical equations and cut-points by Adolph, Evenson, Pfeiffer and Puyau. Predictive validity was examined using paired sample t-tests. Classification accuracy was evaluated using weighted kappas, sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The Pfeiffer equation significantly overestimated AEE during SB and underestimated AEE during LPA (P < 0.0125 for both). There was no significant difference between measured and predicted AEEs during MVPA. The Adolph cut-point showed significantly higher accuracy for classifying SB, LPA and MVPA than all others. The available Actical equation does not provide accurate estimates of AEE across all intensities in preschoolers. However, the Pfeiffer equation performed reasonably well for MVPA. Using cut-points of ≤6 counts · 15 s(-1), 7-286 counts · 15 s(-1) and ≥ 287 counts · 15 s(-1) when classifying SB, LPA and MVPA, respectively, is recommended.

