Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.2K

Normative Databases for Imaging Instrumentation.

Tony Realini1, Linda M Zangwill, John G Flanagan

  • 1*Department of Ophthalmology, West Virginia University Eye Institute, Morgantown, WV †Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla ∥Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA ‡School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley. Berkeley, CA #Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada §National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK ¶Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA **Private Practice, Louisville, KY ††VA New York Harbor Health Care System, Brooklyn ‡‡SUNY College of Optometry, New York, NY.

Journal of Glaucoma
|September 30, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of prostanoids in the retina and optic nerve in health and disease.

Progress in retinal and eye research·2026
Same author

Reversing Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Optineurin E50K Glaucoma: A Metabolic Approach to Neuroprotection.

Research square·2026
Same author

Lipidomic analysis reveals drug-induced lipoxin synthesis in glaucoma treatment.

JCI insight·2026
Same author

Lipoxin B4 Mitigates TRPV4-Activated Müller Cell Gliosis During Ocular Hypertension.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Global Glaucoma Prevalence: Burden and Projection to 2060.

American journal of ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Modeling neurodegeneration in the retina and strategies for developing pan-neurodegenerative therapies.

Molecular neurodegeneration·2025
Same journal

Tonographic outflow facility and intraocular pressure after standalone OMNI surgery.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same journal

Factors Associated With Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Asymmetry in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Among Individuals of African Ancestry.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same journal

Haploinsufficiency of PITX2 in Four Chinese Families with Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same journal

Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Effect of Omidenepag Isopropyl as a Predictor for the Efficacy of Laser Trabeculoplasty.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same journal

Comparative Outcomes Between Micropulse and Slow-Coagulation Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Eyes With Good Visual Acuity.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same journal

Machine Learning With Optical Coherence Tomography for Glaucoma Diagnosis.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardizing ophthalmic imaging reference databases is crucial for accurate glaucoma diagnosis and progression monitoring. Consistent development protocols will enhance the reliability and comparability of data across commercial devices.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Automated imaging is integral to glaucoma management, but its efficacy hinges on high-quality reference databases.
  • Current reference databases for ophthalmic imaging devices lack standardization, impacting diagnostic accuracy.
  • Variability in database size, eligibility criteria, and demographics hinders reliable glaucoma assessment.

Framework:

  • The development of reference databases for ophthalmic imaging devices requires a structured approach.
  • Standardized rules are needed for database creation to ensure consistency and quality.
  • Regulatory clearance processes for imaging devices must address reference database development.

Implementation:

  • A symposium in July 2013 convened experts to discuss challenges in reference database development.

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.4K
Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

436

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.2K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.4K
Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

436
  • Key issues addressed included data collection protocols and eligibility criteria.
  • The symposium aimed to identify best practices for creating robust normative data sets.

    • Implications:

    • Standardizing eligibility requirements and data collection protocols can significantly improve imaging reference databases.
    • Improved standardization will enhance the comparability of results across different commercial ophthalmic imaging instruments.
    • This standardization is vital for advancing glaucoma management and patient care through more reliable diagnostic tools.