Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Techniques for the Evolution of Robust Pentose-fermenting Yeast for Bioconversion of Lignocellulose to Ethanol
Published on: October 24, 2016
Engineered yeast for enhanced CO2 mineralization
Roberto Barbero1, Lino Carnelli2, Anna Simon3
1Department of Biological Engineering, The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 32 Vassar Street, Building 76-561, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA. Tel: +1 617 324 3400.
This study developed a biologically catalyzed carbon dioxide (CO2) mineralization process for efficient CO2 capture. The optimized process using yeast and fly ash is approximately 10% more cost-effective than conventional methods.
Area of Science:
- Biotechnology
- Chemical Engineering
- Environmental Science
Background:
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture from point sources is crucial for mitigating climate change.
- Biological catalysts offer potential for enhancing CO2 mineralization efficiency.
- Industrial-scale application of biological CO2 capture requires cost-effective and scalable solutions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To design, construct, and evaluate a biologically catalyzed CO2 mineralization process at laboratory and industrial scales.
- To screen and optimize biological components for enhanced CO2 hydration and calcium carbonate (CaCO3) mineralization.
- To assess the economic viability of the developed process compared to existing CO2 capture technologies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a yeast display system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for screening carbonic anhydrase isoforms and mineralization peptides.
- Quantitatively measured enhanced rates of CO2 hydration, CaCO3 mineralization, and particle settling.
- Modeled and evaluated the industrial-scale CO2 capture cost using coal fly ash as the CaO source.
Main Results:
- Identified specific carbonic anhydrase and peptide combinations that significantly enhanced CO2 mineralization steps.
- A process using bCA2-yeast and fly ash demonstrated a ~10% cost advantage per ton of CO2 captured compared to non-biological processes.
- Calculated levelized cost of electricity for power plants incorporating this CO2 capture technology.
Conclusions:
- Biologically enhanced CO2 mineralization offers a cost-effective solution for CO2 capture from point sources.
- The developed process shows potential for competing with established methods like MEA absorption.
- Further scale-up and integration into power generation are feasible and economically promising.
Related Concept Videos
Bioreactor Controls-III
Microbes in Beverage Production
Microbial Fermentation
Microbes in Food Production
Designing Growth Media for Bioreactors
Bioreactor Controls-II

