Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026
06:36
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
1.1K
Does Implant Design Affect Implant Primary Stability? A Resonance Frequency Analysis-Based Randomized Split-Mouth
Sergio Alexandre Gehrke1,2, Ulisses Tavares da Silva3, Massimo Del Fabbro4,5
11 Biotecnos Research Center, Santa Maria, Brazil.
The Journal of Oral Implantology
|December 2, 2014
Summary
Conical implants with wide pitch demonstrated superior primary implant stability compared to semiconical implants with narrow pitch. This finding suggests a potential preference for wide-pitch conical designs in immediate or early loading protocols.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Science
- Prosthodontics
Background:
- Implant design significantly influences primary stability, a critical factor for successful osseointegration and functional loading.
- Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is a reliable method for assessing dental implant stability.
- Understanding the impact of specific design features, such as pitch and taper, on implant stability is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the primary and secondary stability of conical implants with wide pitch versus semiconical implants with narrow pitch.
- To determine the influence of implant design parameters on implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
- To assess the potential implications of observed stability differences for immediate or early loading protocols.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled study involving 20 patients with bilateral edentulous maxillary premolar regions.
- Installation of conical, wide-pitch implants in one hemiarch and semiconical, narrow-pitch implants in the contralateral hemiarch.
- Measurement of implant stability using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) immediately after placement (time 1) and at 90 days (time 2).
Main Results:
- A statistically significant difference in implant stability quotient (ISQ) values was observed between the two implant designs at the time of placement (P = .007).
- Conical implants with wide pitch exhibited higher mean ISQ values at time 1 (65.8 ± 6.22) compared to semiconical implants with narrow pitch (63.6 ± 5.95).
- No statistically significant difference in ISQ values was found between the groups at 90 days (P = .54), indicating comparable secondary stability.
Conclusions:
- Conical implants with wide pitch provide greater primary stability than semiconical implants with narrow pitch.
- The enhanced primary stability of wide-pitch conical implants may favor their use in immediate or early loading situations.
- Further research could explore long-term outcomes and patient-reported data for these implant designs.
