Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
Published on: October 25, 2024
[Use of glue in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. A comparative study about 32 cases]
C Willecocq1, A-C Pizzoferrato1, A Fauconnier1
1Service de gynécologie obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, centre hospitalier intercommunal de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en Laye, 10, rue du Champ-Gaillard, 78303 Poissy, France.
Aim:
To study the impact of the use of glue instead of some laparoscopic sutures, on the operative time, the morbidity, and the short-term anatomical and functional results in the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP).
Patients And Methods:
Thirty-two patients underwent a LSCP at Poissy-St-Germain-en-Laye University Hospital. The fixation of prostheses was made either exclusively by sutures (Group S), or by associating sutures (on traction sites) and biological glue (GroupC). Comparison was made after pairing on the number of prostheses associated surgery. Patients' satisfaction was assessed thanks to the validated PGI-I questionnaire.
Results:
The mean operative time (178.7 [Group S] vs 173.1 minutes [Group C]) and the mean hospital stay (3.94 [Group S] vs 3.31 days [Group C]) were not significantly different. Anatomical results (POP-Q) and the mean satisfaction rate in the short-term were similar in both groups (1.67 [Group S] vs 1.30 [Group C]. Morbidity was also similar in both groups; no serious complications have been experienced.
Discussion And Conclusion:
The use of the glue in the LSCP did not significantly reduce the operative time. However, the use of glue for the adhesion of prostheses in addition to sutures has shown its safety and efficacy compared to the conventional technique (sutures exclusively) since the morbidity, the anatomical results and satisfaction rate are identical in the short-term. A study involving a larger number of patients with a longer follow-up seems necessary.
