Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

05:36
Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
Published on: October 18, 2024
2.1K
Rectifying calibration error of Goldmann applanation tonometer is easy!
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
|December 11, 2014
Summary
Calibration errors in Goldmann applanation tonometers (GAT) are common. A simple in-house cleaning and lubrication technique can fix most GAT calibration issues, reducing downtime.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Ophthalmic instrumentation
Background:
- Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) is the gold standard for intraocular pressure measurement.
- Calibration errors in GAT are frequent and often go undetected, impacting clinical accuracy.
- Limitations exist in manufacturer-based repair services for GAT calibration issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a self-taught method for correcting Goldmann applanation tonometer calibration errors.
- To assess the efficacy of an in-house calibration rectification technique for GAT.
Main Methods:
- A pilot study involved 29 Haag-Streit Goldmann tonometers (Model AT 900 C/M).
- The technique included cleaning, lubrication, and, if necessary, counter-weight alignment.
- Calibration error tolerance followed the South East Asia Glaucoma Interest Group criteria.
Main Results:
- 41.3% (12/29) of GATs exhibited calibration errors.
- Cleaning and lubrication resolved errors in 91.6% (11/12) of faulty instruments.
- Only one tonometer required counter-weight adjustment.
Conclusions:
- In-house calibration error rectification for GAT is feasible.
- Basic cleaning and lubrication, performable by eye care professionals, resolve most GAT calibration issues.
- This approach can significantly decrease GAT instrument downtime.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Instrument Calibration
1.4K
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
1.4K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
1.8K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Several factors...
1.8K
Errors in Taping
482
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
482
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
629
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
629
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
114.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
114.0K
Random and Systematic Errors
16.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.3K

