Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Influence of bone architecture on the primary stability of different mini-implant designs
Amanda Carneiro da Cunha1, Mariana Marquezan1, Inaya Lima2
1Orthodontist, Department of Pedodontics and Orthodontics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Introduction:
Mechanical interlocking between a mini-implant (MI) and the bone substrate reflects directly on the primary stability achieved. The purposes of this study were to evaluate MI design performance in distinct bone substrates and correlate geometric characteristics with insertion site quality.
Methods:
Two types of self-drilling MIs (1.6 × 8 mm) were allocated to 2 groups according to their geometric designs: Tomas system (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) and Dual-Top (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, Colo). Forty sections (8 × 10 mm) were taken from bovine pelvic ilium and pubic bone. Geometric design characteristics were evaluated using scanning electron microscope imaging and Image-Pro Insight software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, Md). Bone quality parameters were assessed with a microcomputed tomography system, and primary stability was evaluated by insertion torque and pull-out strength. Intergroup comparisons were performed with analysis of variance and Tukey tests, and the Pearson correlation test was carried out (P <0.05).
Results:
No significant difference was observed in the comparisons of the groups (Tomas: insertion torque, 12.87 N·cm; pull-out strength, 181 N; and Dual-Top: insertion torque, 9.95 N·cm; pull-out strength, 172.5 N) in the ilium. However, the Tomas group had a marked increase in insertion torque (25.08 N·cm; P <0.05) in the pubic bone.
Conclusions:
MI mechanical performance differed according to bone quality parameters, indicating that certain geometric parameters may be set depending on the insertion substrate.
