Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

A Reproducible Cartilage Impact Model to Generate Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis in the Rabbit
Published on: November 21, 2023
Does joint architecture influence the nature of intra-articular fractures?
R A Steer1, S D Smith2, A Lang2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; University of Queensland School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia.
Introduction:
The architecture of joints has potentially the greatest influence on the nature of intra-articular fractures. We analysed a large number of intra-articular fractures with two aims: (1) to determine if the pattern of injuries observed supports our conjecture that the local skeletal architecture is an important factor and (2) to investigate whether associated dislocations further affect the fracture pattern.
Methods:
A retrospective study of intra-articular fractures over a 3.5-year period; 1003 joints met inclusion criteria and were analysed. Three independent investigators determined if fractures affected the convex dome, the concave socket, or if both joint surfaces were involved. Further review determined if a joint dislocation occurred with the initial injury. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way frequency table, and the χ(2) test was used to compare the frequencies of concave and convex surface fractures. The odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to establish the association between the frequencies of concave and convex surface fractures, as well as between dislocation and either fracture surface involvement.
Results:
Of the 1003 fractures analysed, 956 (95.3%) involved only the concavity of the joint; in 21 fractures (2.1%) both joint surfaces were involved; and in 26 fractures (2.6%) only the convexity was involved (χ(2)=1654.9, df=2, p<0.0001). As expected, the concavity was 20.8 times more likely to fail than the convexity (11.2-36.6, 95% CI). However, the risk of fracturing the convex surface was 18.6 times higher (9.8-35.2, 95% CI) in association with a simultaneous joint dislocation, compared to those cases without a joint dislocation.
Conclusions:
These results very strongly support the study hypotheses: the skeletal architecture of joints clearly plays a highly significant role in determining the nature of intra-articular fractures. Intra-articular fractures involving the convexity are much more likely to be associated with a concurrent joint dislocation.
More Related Videos
06:59Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
Published on: August 14, 2018
06:28Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection and Synovial Fluid Lavage in a Rodent Model to Study Joint Inflammation and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis
Published on: September 2, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints
Introduction to Joints
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Knee Joint
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...
Ankle Joint
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...