Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks
Published on: June 9, 2023
Decoupled spin crossover and structural phase transition in a molecular iron(II) complex.
Laurence J Kershaw Cook1, Helena J Shepherd, Tim P Comyn
1School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT (UK), Fax: (+44) 113-343-6565 http://www.chem.leeds.ac.uk/People/Halcrow.html.
Iron complexes with pyrazolylpyridine ligands exhibit abrupt spin-crossover (SCO) and phase transitions. The methylsulfanyl substituent in one complex drives cooperative SCO and distinct crystallographic changes, influencing light-induced spin-state trapping.
Area of Science:
- Coordination Chemistry
- Materials Science
- Solid-State Physics
Background:
- Spin-crossover (SCO) in iron(II) complexes is a phenomenon sensitive to external stimuli.
- Crystallographic phase transitions can influence SCO behavior and cooperativity.
- Light-induced excited-spin-state trapping (LIESST) is a key characteristic of SCO materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the spin-crossover behavior and crystallographic phase transitions of novel iron(II) complexes.
- To elucidate the role of specific substituents in modulating SCO cooperativity and phase transitions.
- To study the LIESST effect and relaxation kinetics in these SCO materials.
Main Methods:
- Synthesis and single-crystal X-ray diffraction of iron(II) complexes with 4-(methylsulfanyl)-2,6-di(pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (bppSMe), 4-bromo-2,6-di(pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (bppBr), and 4-iodo-2,6-di(pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (bppI).
- Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements to probe spin-crossover events.
- UV-Vis spectroscopy and variable-temperature powder X-ray diffraction to study phase transitions and LIESST effect.
Main Results:
- Crystalline [Fe(bppSMe)2][BF4]2 exhibits an abrupt SCO at 265 K and a separate phase transition near 205 K, involving a unit-cell contraction.
- Powdered [Fe(bppSMe)2][BF4]2 retains the high-temperature phase over a broad temperature range with SCO behavior similar to single crystals.
- The bromo and iodo analogues ([Fe(bppBr)2][BF4]2 and [Fe(bppI)2][BF4]2) show gradual SCO and adopt the low-temperature crystallographic phase in both spin states.
- Intermolecular steric interactions involving the methylsulfanyl group are identified as the cause for the enhanced cooperativity and phase transition in the bppSMe complex.
- All three compounds display the LIESST effect but exhibit complex relaxation kinetics with both exponential and sigmoidal components.
Conclusions:
- The methylsulfanyl substituent significantly influences SCO cooperativity and induces a distinct crystallographic phase transition in iron(II) complexes.
- The interplay between SCO and crystallographic phase transitions is crucial for understanding material properties.
- Complex LIESST relaxation kinetics highlight the sensitivity of these SCO materials to light stimuli.
More Related Videos
09:06Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
08:55Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...