Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

06:04
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
955
Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation
Alexandre Caixeta Guimarães1, Guilherme Machado de Carvalho1, Alexandre S M Duarte1
1Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FCM/UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
|February 5, 2015
Summary
This study shows that cochlear implant surgery using a soft technique preserved hearing in 89.4% of patients with low-frequency residual hearing. The surgical approach to the inner ear did not significantly impact hearing preservation outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Audiology
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- Electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) is effective for individuals with low-frequency residual hearing inadequately addressed by hearing aids.
- Preserving residual hearing during cochlear implant surgery is crucial for EAS efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess hearing preservation rates in patients following cochlear implant surgery.
- To compare hearing preservation based on different surgical approaches to the inner ear.
Main Methods:
- A soft surgical technique was employed in 19 subjects using the atraumatic MED-EL FLEX™ EAS electrode.
- Pre- and postoperative audiometric tests were conducted, with an average follow-up of 18.4 months.
- Electrode insertion methods (cochleostomy vs. round window) were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Overall hearing preservation was achieved in 89.4% of cases (17 out of 19 patients).
- Five patients experienced total hearing preservation, while two had no preservation.
- Electrode insertion via the round window approach (16 patients) showed no significant difference in preservation compared to cochleostomy (3 patients).
- All implanted patients demonstrated benefit, including those relying solely on electrical stimulation.
Conclusions:
- The soft surgical technique and atraumatic electrode facilitated high rates of hearing preservation in EAS candidates.
- Both cochleostomy and round window approaches yielded comparable hearing preservation results in this cohort.

