Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

04:32
Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
Published on: December 20, 2024
1.0K
New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review
Sabine Reinfeldt1, Bo Håkansson1, Hamidreza Taghavi1
1Department of Signals and Systems, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Medical Devices (Auckland, N.Z.)
|February 6, 2015
Summary
Advancements in bone-conduction devices (BCDs) offer new hearing rehabilitation options. Transcutaneous BCDs show promise for improved audiology, especially active transcutaneous direct-drive systems.
Area of Science:
- Audiology and Hearing Rehabilitation
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Devices
Background:
- The landscape of bone-conduction devices (BCDs) for hearing loss is rapidly evolving.
- Existing BCDs include skin-drive and direct-drive categories, with percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids being dominant.
- Increasing development focuses on transcutaneous BCDs to address limitations of percutaneous implants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To categorize and describe all currently available or clinically trialed bone-conduction devices.
- To review the principles behind different BCD classifications.
- To discuss the challenges and future potential of emerging transcutaneous BCD technologies.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and categorization of bone-conduction devices based on their operational principles.
- Classification into skin-drive (conventional, passive transcutaneous) and direct-drive (percutaneous, active transcutaneous) categories.
- Analysis of current market presence and developmental trends, particularly for transcutaneous solutions.
Main Results:
- Bone-conduction devices are classified into skin-drive and direct-drive types.
- Percutaneous direct-drive devices (bone-anchored hearing aids) currently dominate the market.
- Transcutaneous solutions, both skin-drive and direct-drive, are under development to overcome percutaneous implant issues, facing challenges in power, attachment, invasiveness, and MRI compatibility.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous direct-drive BCDs will remain important, but transcutaneous BCDs are expected to gain market share, particularly for specific hearing loss levels.
- Active transcutaneous direct-drive BCDs are highly promising but require further clinical validation.
- More research is needed to define inclusion criteria and fully assess the benefits and drawbacks of new transcutaneous BCDs.

