Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

23:56
Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
17.4K
Body fluid cell counts by automated methods
1Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-3205, USA.
Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
|February 14, 2015
Summary
Automated cell counting is replacing manual methods for body fluids, offering better accuracy and efficiency. However, current automated systems struggle with low cell counts, still requiring microscopic review for malignancy detection.
Area of Science:
- Clinical pathology
- Laboratory automation
- Hematology
Background:
- Manual cell counting using hemocytometers is being superseded by automated methods in body fluid analysis.
- Automation promises enhanced accuracy, efficiency, and standardization in laboratory diagnostics.
- Specialized body fluid modes on hematology analyzers are adapting automation for this specific application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the current state and limitations of automated cell counting for body fluid analysis.
- To highlight the benefits and challenges associated with adopting automated methods in clinical laboratories.
- To determine the specific scenarios where automated cell counting is applicable and where manual review remains essential.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and technological capabilities of automated hematology analyzers with body fluid modes.
- Comparison of performance metrics between manual and automated cell counting techniques for various body fluid types.
- Analysis of the functional sensitivity of automated methods, particularly concerning low cell counts.
Main Results:
- Automated cell counting demonstrates significant advantages in accuracy, efficiency, and standardization over manual methods.
- The functional sensitivity of current automated methods is limited, especially for body fluids with low cellularity.
- Microscopic examination remains crucial for accurate diagnosis when malignancy is suspected, irrespective of automated analysis.
Conclusions:
- Automated cell counting is a valuable tool for body fluid analysis, improving routine laboratory workflows.
- Limitations in detecting low cell counts necessitate continued integration of microscopic review in specific clinical contexts.
- Further technological advancements are needed to enhance the sensitivity of automated methods for all body fluid analyses.

