Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Comparison of Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Measure Adherence Between Oncology Fellows, Advanced
Jason Zhu1, Tian Zhang2,3, Radhika Shah3,4
1Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract:
Quality improvement measures are uniformly applied to all oncology providers, regardless of their roles. Little is known about differences in adherence to these measures between oncology fellows, advance practice providers (APP), and attending physicians. We investigated conformance across Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) measures for oncology fellows, advance practice providers, and attending physicians at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (DVAMC). Using data collected from the Spring 2012 and 2013 QOPI cycles, we abstracted charts of patients and separated them based on their primary provider. Descriptive statistics and the chi-square test were calculated for each QOPI measure between fellows, advanced practice providers (APPs), and attending physicians. A total of 169 patients were reviewed. Of these, 31 patients had a fellow, 39 had an APP, and 99 had an attending as their primary oncology provider. Fellows and attending physicians performed similarly on 90 of 94 QOPI metrics. High-performing metrics included several core QOPI measures including documenting consent for chemotherapy, recommending adjuvant chemotherapy when appropriate, and prescribing serotonin antagonists when prescribing emetogenic chemotherapies. Low-performing metrics included documentation of treatment summary and taking action to address problems with emotional well-being by the second office visit. Attendings documented the plan for oral chemotherapy more often (92 vs. 63%, P=0.049). However, after the chart audit, we found that fellows actually documented the plan for oral chemotherapy 88% of the time (p=0.73). APPs and attendings performed similarly on 88 of 90 QOPI measures. The quality of oncology care tends to be similar between attendings and fellows overall; some of the significant differences do not remain significant after a second manual chart review, highlighting that the use of manual data collection for QOPI analysis is an imperfect system, and there may be significant inter-observer variability.
Insights
Oncology quality measures show similar adherence between fellows and attending physicians, with some differences diminishing upon review. Advance practice providers also demonstrated comparable performance to attendings.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Medical Education
Background:
- Quality improvement measures in oncology are applied universally across provider roles.
- Limited data exists on adherence variations among oncology fellows, advance practice providers (APPs), and attending physicians.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare adherence to Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) measures among oncology fellows, APPs, and attending physicians at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (DVAMC).
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from Spring 2012 and 2013 QOPI cycles, abstracting patient charts categorized by primary provider.
- Performed descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to compare QOPI measure conformance across provider groups (fellows, APPs, attendings).
Main Results:
- Fellows and attending physicians showed similar performance on 90 of 94 QOPI metrics.
- High performance was noted in chemotherapy consent, adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations, and antiemetic prescribing.
- Low performance areas included treatment summary documentation and addressing emotional well-being.
- APPs and attendings performed similarly on 88 of 90 QOPI measures.
Conclusions:
- Overall oncology care quality is comparable between attending physicians and fellows.
- Manual data collection for QOPI analysis may introduce inter-observer variability, impacting observed differences.
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Patient-centered Care