Feasibility of a screening program for at-risk children following accidental injury

Sonja March1, Justin A Kenardy, Vanessa E Cobham

  • 1School of Psychology, Counselling and Community, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

Journal of Traumatic Stress
|February 24, 2015
PubMed

Insights

Screening hospitalized youth for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is feasible but needs improved response rates. Rescreening identified fewer at-risk children, supporting a watchful waiting approach for trauma-exposed youth.

Area of Science:

  • Trauma and Injury Research
  • Child and Adolescent Mental Health
  • Public Health Screening

Background:

  • Screening is recommended for identifying trauma-exposed individuals needing monitoring.
  • Effective large-scale screening program implementation methods remain underdeveloped.
  • Hospitalized youth exposed to injury are a vulnerable population requiring accessible mental health support.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the feasibility and utility of a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening program for hospitalized youth in Australia.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of initial screening and a subsequent rescreening phase.
  • To assess the rate of PTSD diagnosis and treatment initiation following screening.

Main Methods:

  • A screening program was implemented in 3 Australian hospitals for youth exposed to injury.
  • Eligible families were contacted, and children were screened for PTSD risk 1-2 weeks post-injury.
  • A rescreening phase was introduced at 4-6 weeks post-injury for children initially identified as at risk.

Main Results:

  • 546 children (48.0%) were screened; 95 (17.4%) were identified as at risk.
  • Rescreening identified 26 (38.2%) children still at risk at 4-6 weeks post-injury.
  • 21 children (3.8%) were diagnosed with PTSD, and 17 (3.1%) commenced treatment; response rates were lower than anticipated.

Conclusions:

  • Screening successfully identified children with PTSD, but low response rates limited overall program utility.
  • The rescreening phase indicated that not all at-risk children require immediate intervention, supporting a watchful waiting strategy.
  • Findings align with previous research on natural symptom remission and highlight the value of rescreening in trauma-exposed youth management.