Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Long-Term Memory01:18

Long-Term Memory

916
Long-term memory is a relatively permanent type of memory, capable of storing vast amounts of information over extended periods. Its storage capacity is generally considered unlimited.
Long-term memory can be categorized into two primary types: explicit and implicit memory. Explicit memory, also known as declarative memory, involves the conscious recollection of information that we deliberately try to remember, recall, and articulate. This type of memory encompasses specific facts, events, and...
916

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Same/different concept learning by primates and birds.

Learning & behavior·2021
Same author

Sensory and working memory in a spatial change-detection task by pigeons and humans.

Behavioural processes·2019
Same author

Choice-Related Activity during Visual Slant Discrimination in Macaque CIP But Not V3A.

eNeuro·2019
Same author

Episodic Memory: Manipulation and Replay of Episodic Memories by Rats.

Current biology : CB·2018
Same author

Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.

Learning & behavior·2018
Same author

Testing complex animal cognition: Concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2018
Same journal

Time does the teaching.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same journal

Language learning in canines and toddlers: Shared origins?

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of outcome affective value in driving human Pavlovian learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crashing the tea party: Imagining alternative explanations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same journal

Static outcomes: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation at Fp3 or P3 does not modulate perceptual learning as indexed by the intermixed-blocked effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same journal

A method for visual psychophysics based on the navigational behavior of desert ants (Melophorus bagoti).

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

8.8K

Monkey visual short-term memory directly compared to humans.

L Caitlin Elmore1, Anthony A Wright1

  • 1Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Health Science Center.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Learning and Cognition
|February 24, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Monkeys show similar visual short-term memory (STM) decline as humans when memory load increases. Despite lower accuracy, their performance follows the same inverse power-law, suggesting shared cognitive processes.

More Related Videos

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

15.3K
T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice
17:45

T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice

Published on: February 26, 2012

41.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

8.8K
Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

15.3K
T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice
17:45

T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice

Published on: February 26, 2012

41.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Comparative Psychology
  • Primate Behavior

Background:

  • Understanding visual short-term memory (VSTM) is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research indicates differences in VSTM capacity across species.
  • Direct comparison of VSTM under controlled parameters is needed to identify underlying similarities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare visual short-term memory (VSTM) performance between rhesus monkeys and humans.
  • To investigate if monkeys and humans exhibit similar functional relationships in VSTM decline with increasing memory load.
  • To determine if species similarities in VSTM can be identified using standardized testing parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Rhesus monkeys were trained on a change detection task using identical stimuli (colored squares, clip art), viewing times, and delays as human studies.
  • Performance accuracy was recorded for array sizes of 2, 4, and 6 items.
  • Memory capacity was calculated, and performance data were analyzed using the inverse power-law of display size.

Main Results:

  • Monkeys demonstrated lower accuracy than humans across all tested array sizes and stimulus types.
  • Calculated memory capacities for monkeys were approximately 1 item or less.
  • Both monkey and human performance data were accurately described by the inverse power-law of display size.

Conclusions:

  • The inverse power-law effectively characterizes VSTM decline with memory load in both species.
  • Similar functional relationships in VSTM performance suggest shared underlying cognitive processes between monkeys and humans.
  • Standardizing testing parameters strengthens the evidence for conserved VSTM mechanisms across species.