Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.6K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

1.0K
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
1.0K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.9K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Delay discounting and under-valuing of recent information predict poorer adherence to social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Rewards that are near increase impulsive action.

iScience·2021
Same author

Waiting in intertemporal choice tasks affects discounting and subjective time perception.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2020
Same author

Temporal discounting does not influence body mass index.

Physiology & behavior·2020
Same author

The case of muddled units in temporal discounting.

Cognition·2020
Same author

Hunger increases delay discounting of food and non-food rewards.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.5K

Bayesian accounts of covert selective attention: A tutorial review.

Benjamin T Vincent1

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK, b.t.vincent@dundee.ac.uk.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|March 13, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Optimal observer models explain covert selective attention by applying Bayesian inference. These models reveal how noisy sensory data and prior expectations generate observed attention phenomena.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.5K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Optimal observer models provide a theoretical framework for understanding decision-making and attention.
  • Probabilistic formulations allow quantitative comparisons between models and human performance.
  • Bayesian approaches offer a powerful lens for studying covert selective attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present novel Bayesian models for four key covert attention paradigms.
  • To illustrate optimal observer predictions across various experimental manipulations.
  • To demonstrate the utility of graphical model notation and supplementary code for accessibility.

Main Methods:

  • Formulation of novel Bayesian models for covert attention paradigms.
  • Application of graphical model notation for clear model representation.
  • Review of empirical and modeling evidence on attention phenomena.

Main Results:

  • Optimal observer models predict experimental outcomes in covert attention tasks.
  • Many observed phenomena in covert selective attention are by-products of Bayesian inference.
  • Model predictions align with empirical findings across diverse experimental manipulations.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian inference with noisy sensory data and prior knowledge explains covert attention phenomena.
  • Optimal observer models offer a unified framework for understanding covert selective attention.
  • The study bridges theoretical modeling with practical implementation for cognitive science research.