Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

7.6K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
7.6K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.5K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.5K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

12.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
12.7K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

11.1K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
11.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.9K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

9.2K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
9.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The meaningfulness of searching for minimal exposure duration to understand visual perception.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Perceptual learning without feedback is accompanied with systematic changes in confidence processing.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

When is "now"? In the past to compensate for the sensation of time or in the future as a prediction of the temporal sensory horizon?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Contrasting holistic-compensatory with probabilistic heuristic strategies in multi-attribute decisions.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Natural scene segmentation dynamics reveal iterative Bayesian inference.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Low confidence for perceptual completion of partially occluded objects.

Journal of vision·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.1K

Weighting mean and variability during confidence judgments.

Vincent de Gardelle1, Pascal Mamassian2

  • 1Laboratoire de Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS & Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, CNRS & Université Paris 1, Paris, France; Paris School of Economics, Paris, France.

Plos One
|March 21, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Human confidence in visual tasks is dissociable from actual performance. Stimulus variables influence confidence judgments independently, showing distinct weighting in decision-making processes.

More Related Videos

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.4K
Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.1K
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.4K
Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • Humans exhibit high precision in visual tasks and can assess their performance.
  • Metacognitive evaluation processes and their dissociation from task performance remain unclear.
  • The influence of stimulus variables on confidence judgments beyond performance impact is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether stimulus variables affect confidence judgments independently of task performance.
  • To explore the dissociation between confidence and performance in a visual task.
  • To understand how observers weight different stimulus variables in metacognitive evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • A motion categorization task involving moving dots was employed.
  • Stimulus variables, specifically mean and variance of motion directions, were manipulated.
  • Conditions with matched performance but differing stimulus properties (low-mean low-variance vs. high-mean high-variance) were created.

Main Results:

  • Observers showed significant differences in confidence between conditions with matched performance.
  • Confidence judgments exhibited individual heterogeneity but were stable over time (one week).
  • Stimulus variables were weighted differently by observers in their confidence judgments.

Conclusions:

  • Confidence and performance in visual tasks are dissociable.
  • Metacognitive evaluations are influenced by stimulus variables in a manner distinct from their effect on performance.
  • Observers' confidence judgments reflect differential weighting of stimulus properties limiting performance.