Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
Aortic dilation rates in patients with biscuspid aortic valve: correlations with cusp fusion phenotype
Insights
Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and left-right (L-R) cusp fusion show faster aortic dilation rates compared to those with right-non coronary (R-N) fusion. This highlights distinct pathological entities influencing aortic root and ascending aorta growth.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Medical Imaging
- Genetics and Genomics
Background:
- Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart defect.
- Aortic dilation is a known complication of BAV.
- Specific BAV cusp fusion patterns, such as left-right (L-R) and right-non coronary (R-N), may have distinct implications for aortic disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the pattern and rate of aortic dilation in patients with isolated non-surgical BAV.
- To differentiate between L-R and R-N cusp fusion phenotypes regarding aortic dilation.
- To investigate if L-R and R-N fusion represent distinct pathological entities affecting the aorta.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of consecutive patients with BAV and at least two echocardiographic assessments (2006-2012).
- Exclusion of patients with significant valvular disease, aortic aneurysm (>50 mm), or unrepaired coarctation.
- Longitudinal analysis of aortic diameters (annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, ascending aorta) using mixed-effect models.
Main Results:
- Analysis of 590 echocardiograms in 212 patients (147 L-R, 65 R-N phenotype) with a median follow-up of 3.6 years.
- Larger baseline aortic diameters at the sinuses of Valsalva in the L-R group compared to the R-N group (33.8 ± 5.3 mm vs. 30.8 ± 4.8 mm; p < 0.001).
- Significantly higher rates of aortic dilation at the sinuses of Valsalva (0.41 ± 0.11 mm/year vs. 0.01 ± 0.08 mm/year; p < 0.001) and ascending aorta (0.58 ± 0.08 mm/year vs. 0.18 ± 0.09 mm/year; p < 0.001) in the L-R group.
Conclusions:
- Aortic dilation rates differ based on BAV cusp fusion patterns.
- The L-R cusp fusion phenotype is associated with faster rates of aortic sinus and ascending aortic dilation compared to the R-N phenotype.
- These findings support the concept of distinct pathological entities for different BAV cusp fusion patterns.
Background And Aim Of The Study:
The study aim was to compare the pattern and rate of aortic dilation in patients with isolated non-surgical bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) with left-right fusion (L-R) and right-non coronary fusion (R-N). Although the etiology and optimal management of aortic dilation associated with BAV remain the subject of debate, recent data have suggested that L-R and R-N cusp fusion phenotypes represent distinct pathological entities.
Methods:
Consecutive patients with BAV and at least two echocardiographic assessments made between 2006 and 2012 were reviewed. Patients with hemodynamically significant valvular disease, aortic aneurysm (> 50 mm) or unrepaired aortic coarctation were excluded. Longitudinal analyses of the aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction and ascending aortic diameters were performed using mixed-effect models.
Results:
A total of 590 echocardiographic studies was analyzed in 212 patients (mean age 33 ± 14 years), of which 147 had L-R phenotype and 65 had R-N phenotype. The median follow up was 3.6 years. Baseline aortic diameters at the sinuses of Valsalva were larger in patients with L-R compared to R-N fusion (33.8 ± 5.3 mm versus 30.8 ± 4.8 mm; p < 0.001). At this level, the rate of aortic dilation was higher with L-R versus R-N fusion (0.41 ± 0.11 mm/year versus 0.01 ± 0.08 mm/year; p < 0.001). The rate of proximal ascending aortic dilation was also higher with L-R versus R-N fusion (0.58 ± 0.08 mm/year versus 0.18 ± 0.09 mm/year; p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Aortic dilation rates vary according to the pattern of BAV cusp fusion, with faster rates of aortic sinus and ascending aortic dilation associated with the L-R compared to R-N phenotype.
More Related Videos
11:16In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
12:12Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests