Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

11:16
In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
4.0K
Fast 4D flow MRI intracranial segmentation and quantification in tortuous arteries
Eric Schrauben1,2, Anders Wåhlin2,3,4, Khalid Ambarki2,5
1Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI
|April 8, 2015
Summary
A new centerline processing scheme (CPS) for 4D flow MRI significantly speeds up analysis of carotid siphons. This method accurately quantifies blood flow and vessel area, reducing processing time by over 4.6 times.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- 4D flow MRI allows comprehensive blood flow assessment in cerebral arteries.
- Clinical application of 4D flow MRI is hindered by lengthy postprocessing and user-dependent variability.
- Accurate quantification of flow dynamics in complex vascular geometries like the carotid siphon is challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop, validate, and implement a centerline processing scheme (CPS) for semiautomated segmentation and quantification of carotid siphons using 4D flow MRI.
- To assess the accuracy and efficiency of the CPS compared to manual processing and 2D phase-contrast MRI.
- To investigate flow and area parameters along the internal carotid artery (ICA) siphon in healthy subjects.
Main Methods:
- A novel centerline processing scheme (CPS) was developed for semiautomated segmentation of cerebral artery trees from 4D flow MRI data.
- Flow parameters were quantified at planes perpendicular to the vessel centerline.
- Validation was performed using an intracranial flow phantom and in vivo measurements in the internal carotid artery (ICA) of 10 healthy volunteers, comparing CPS with 2D phase-contrast MRI and manual 4D flow processing.
Main Results:
- Phantom studies showed high correlation for area (R=0.95) and flow (R=0.94) between CPS and 2D measurements.
- In vivo validation demonstrated high correlation for waveforms (R=0.93) with manual processing.
- The CPS reduced processing time by a factor of 4.6 compared to manual methods. Significantly decreased distal ICA siphon area (P=0.0017) was observed, with unchanged flow (P=0.84).
Conclusions:
- The developed CPS enables fast, semiautomated analysis of intracranial 4D flow MRI data.
- The method demonstrates internal consistency through flow conservation along the tortuous ICA siphon.
- This approach addresses key clinical translation hurdles in 4D flow MRI analysis.

