Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

327
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
327
Relationship Growth01:27

Relationship Growth

296
Interpersonal relationships progress through stages, beginning with awareness and moving toward mutuality, where emotional connections deepen. While many relationships remain at moderate levels of mutuality, deeper connections form through self-disclosure, trust, and interdependence.Self-DisclosureSelf-disclosure involves revealing personal information, starting with surface-level details and gradually progressing to more intimate content. As trust grows, individuals feel more comfortable...
296
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

40.0K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
40.0K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.4K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.4K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.7K
Importance of Need for Affiliation01:25

Importance of Need for Affiliation

429
The need for affiliation is a fundamental human motive that drives individuals to form and maintain interpersonal relationships. This universal drive varies in intensity among individuals due to genetic predispositions and life experiences, shaping it into a relatively stable personality trait. Social inclusion enhances emotional well-being by fulfilling the need for affiliation, whereas social exclusion leads to distress, negative emotions, and cognitive impairments.Psychological and Emotional...
429

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gene amplification in the premalignant stages of non-small cell lung cancer development.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Integrative Genomic and AI Approaches to Lung Cancer and Implications for Disease Prevention in Former Smokers.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Identification of oncofetal PIWI-interacting RNAs as potential prognostic biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer.

Frontiers in genetics·2025
Same author

Why do bootlickers get empowered more than boat-rockers? The effects of voice and helping on empowering leadership through threat and goal congruence perceptions.

The Journal of applied psychology·2025
Same author

Profiling the cell-specific small non-coding RNA transcriptome of the human placenta.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Identification of Genomic Instability-Associated LncRNAs as Potential Therapeutic Targets in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Cancers·2025
Same journal

The impact of impression management on writing tendencies: Investigating faking susceptibility of open-ended personality assessments.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Grateful leaders and attentive followers: How grateful attention transmits the cascade of gratitude expressions to strengthen coworker relationships.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Scoring employment interviews with large language models: Evaluation design components, validity investigations, and best practice recommendations.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A profile analysis of leader interpersonal emotion management strategies.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A choice architecture intervention to increase diversity: Diverse defaults can counteract hiring discrimination.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Transformational leadership in context: A meta-analysis of 40 years of research.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 13, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.7K

Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis.

Stephen H Courtright, Gary R Thurgood1, Greg L Stewart2

  • 1Department of Management.

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|May 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study clarifies team interdependence, finding task interdependence boosts performance via task processes, while outcome interdependence enhances it through relational dynamics. This research advances understanding of team functioning and effectiveness.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
05:59

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

Published on: October 6, 2023

3.6K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 13, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.7K
Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
05:59

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

Published on: October 6, 2023

3.6K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Team dynamics and organizational psychology.
  • Social psychology of work groups.

Background:

  • Interdependence is crucial for team design, yet its forms and impacts lack clarity.
  • Existing research offers varied conceptualizations of team interdependence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a conceptual framework for team interdependence.
  • To differentiate the effects of task and outcome interdependence on team functioning and performance.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review to integrate interdependence concepts.
  • Meta-analysis of 107 independent samples (7,563 teams).
  • Path modeling to test hypothesized differential effects.

Main Results:

  • Task interdependence primarily impacts team performance through task-focused functioning (e.g., collective efficacy).
  • Outcome interdependence primarily impacts team performance through relational functioning (e.g., cohesion).
  • Meta-analytic path model strongly supported these differential effects.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a clear framework distinguishing task and outcome interdependence.
  • Findings highlight the distinct pathways through which different interdependence forms influence team outcomes.
  • Offers implications for optimizing team design and effectiveness in work settings.