Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

5.9K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
5.9K
What is Population Genetics?01:25

What is Population Genetics?

66.0K
A population is composed of members of the same species that simultaneously live and interact in the same area. When individuals in a population breed, they pass down their genes to their offspring. Many of these genes are polymorphic, meaning that they occur in multiple variants. Such variations of a gene are referred to as alleles. The collective set of all the alleles within a population is known as the gene pool.
66.0K
Genetic Variation01:25

Genetic Variation

1.6K
Genetic variation is the diversity in DNA sequences found among individuals of the same species. This diversity is crucial for a species' survival because it helps organisms adapt to environmental changes. Genetic variation begins with fertilization, where an egg and sperm cell merge. Each of these cells carries 23 chromosomes, up to 46 in the fertilized egg. Chromosomes are long DNA strands that contain genes, the basic units of heredity.
Genes exist in different versions called alleles,...
1.6K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

410
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
410
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

45.4K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
45.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Translating functional molecular knowledge into crop-breeding success.

Nature reviews. Genetics·2026
Same author

Correction: DeltaBreed: A BrAPI-centric breeding data information system.

PloS one·2026
Same author

GrainGenes: genetics, genomes, and pangenomes.

Genetics·2025
Same author

DeltaBreed: A BrAPI-centric breeding data information system.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Author Correction: A pangenome and pantranscriptome of hexaploid oat.

Nature·2025
Same author

Global genomic population structure of wild and cultivated oat reveals signatures of chromosome rearrangements.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Genomic dissection of hoof and leg conformation in Swiss dairy cattle populations reveals polygenic architecture and a recessive HYAL1 nonsense variant affecting longevity in Holstein cattle.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
Same journal

The mitogenome diversity of Alpine Rendena cattle: new clues on its maternal origin and the complex substructure of haplogroup T3.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
Same journal

Genomic partitioning and functional dissection of inbreeding depression for stature in Brown Swiss cattle.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
Same journal

Modest contribution of metabolomic data to genomic prediction of breeding values for feed conversion ratio in pigs.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
Same journal

Determining crossover count and position in two pig lines with different selection histories.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
Same journal

Effect of methylation on genome mutability in cattle.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K

Optimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm.

Deniz Akdemir1, Julio I Sanchez2, Jean-Luc Jannink3

  • 1Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. da346@cornell.edu.

Genetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE
|May 7, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Optimizing training sets for genomic selection improves the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). This method enhances prediction reliability by selecting individuals based on genetic information, outperforming random sampling.

More Related Videos

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.6K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.6K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Quantitative Genetics
  • Plant Breeding
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Genomic selection (GS) utilizes genomic information to predict breeding values.
  • Accurate genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) are crucial for efficient breeding programs.
  • The composition of the training population significantly impacts GEBV accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computationally efficient method for selecting an optimal training set for genomic selection.
  • To improve the accuracy of GEBV by optimizing training set selection using genetic information.
  • To dynamically build genomic selection models considering test set genotypes.

Main Methods:

  • Derived a statistic to measure the reliability of GEBV based on genetic information.
  • Employed a genetic algorithm to select an optimized training set from candidate individuals.
  • Phenotyped the selected subset to create the training set for genomic selection models.
  • Validated the methodology on diverse plant datasets (Arabidopsis, wheat, rice, maize).

Main Results:

  • The proposed training set selection method significantly improved GEBV accuracies compared to random sampling.
  • The dynamic model building process, incorporating test set genotypes, enhanced prediction performance.
  • Consistent improvements in accuracy were observed across different plant species.

Conclusions:

  • Optimized training set selection is a powerful strategy to boost genomic selection efficiency.
  • The developed methodology provides a robust approach for enhancing GEBV prediction in breeding programs.
  • This dynamic training selection enhances the reliability and accuracy of genomic prediction models.