Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Expected Value01:15

Expected Value

8.3K
The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:
8.3K
The Mean Value Theorem01:26

The Mean Value Theorem

191
The Mean Value Theorem establishes a fundamental connection between the overall change in a quantity and its change at a specific instant. It formalizes the idea that average change over an interval must be reflected by instantaneous change at some point within that interval. When a function behaves smoothly across a range, the theorem guarantees that this connection always exists.This relationship is captured mathematically by the Mean Value Theorem, as stated below.The meaning of this result...
191
Average Value of a Function01:17

Average Value of a Function

160
The average value of a function over a closed interval can be interpreted geometrically as the height of a rectangle whose area equals the net area under the curve across that interval. This net area accounts for both positive and negative contributions of the function, providing a single representative value that reflects the function’s overall behaviorA practical illustration of this idea arises when monitoring the temperature inside a greenhouse over a twenty-four-hour period. Although the...
160
Geometric Mean01:15

Geometric Mean

4.2K
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a data set. In some data sets, the data is inherently multiplicative, and the arithmetic mean is not useful. For example, the human population multiplies with time, and so does the credit amount of financial investment, as the interest compounds over successive time intervals.
In cases of multiplicative data, the geometric mean is used for statistical analysis. First, the product of all the elements is taken. Then, if there are n elements in the...
4.2K
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy01:22

Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy

7.6K
The potency of a drug is the measure of its ability to produce a biological response and can be compared by looking at the half-maximum effective concentration or EC50 values of different drugs. A lower EC50 value indicates higher potency of the drug. In the dose–response curve of two antihypertensive drugs, candesartan and irbesartan, a significant difference is observed in their EC50 values. A lower EC50 value for candesartan indicates that it is more potent than irbesartan, as it...
7.6K
Time Course of Drug Effect01:14

Time Course of Drug Effect

3.0K
The progression of a drug's impact can be analyzed by examining both the concentration-time course and the effect-time course. The concentration-time course is determined by the drug's half-life and is influenced by factors such as its pharmacokinetics, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. The effect of the drug is often related to its concentration in the plasma and is calculated using the maximum drug effect and the plasma concentration that generates 50...
3.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

XIS-humidity: a daily spatiotemporal machine-learning model for dew point in the contiguous United States.

Environmental research communications·2026
Same author

XIS-PM<sub>2.5</sub>: A daily spatiotemporal machine-learning model for PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the contiguous United States.

Environmental research·2025
Same author

XIS-temperature: A daily spatiotemporal machine-learning model for air temperature in the contiguous United States.

Environmental research·2025
Same author

Behavioral and psychiatric correlates of brain responses to social feedback.

Psychophysiology·2023
Same author

Pattern-setting for improving risky decision-making.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2022
Same author

Borderline personality features and altered social feedback processing in emerging adults: An EEG study.

Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry·2022
Same journal

The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same journal

Shaping the extinction burst: Increasing its probability and preventing its emergence across topographies.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the combined effects of effort and probability on monetary discounting.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same journal

An improved translational approach to studying persistence-strengthening effects of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same journal

Interactions between the effects of food and water motivating operations on concurrent food- and water-reinforced responding in mice.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same journal

Odor-visual and visual-visual matching to sample with dogs.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.2K

The amount effect and marginal value.

Howard Rachlin1, Kodi B Arfer1, Vasiliy Safin1

  • 1Stony Brook University.

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|May 28, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Delay discounting shows that larger rewards are less affected by delays. This study found value functions are steeper for delayed rewards, confirming the amount effect in delay discounting.

Keywords:
amount effectdelay discountingdiminishing marginal valuevalue function

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.2K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science
  • Neuroeconomics

Background:

  • Delay discounting describes how reward value decreases with time.
  • The 'amount effect' suggests larger rewards are discounted less steeply than smaller ones.
  • Previous research primarily used choice experiments to study delay discounting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically obtain value functions for both immediate and delayed rewards using direct judgment.
  • To investigate whether the amount effect in delay discounting is observable through direct value judgments.
  • To determine if value functions differ based on reward delay.

Main Methods:

  • Direct judgment tasks were employed to assess the subjective value of immediate and delayed rewards.
  • Participants provided value ratings for various reward amounts presented at different delays.
  • Value functions were constructed based on these direct judgments.

Main Results:

  • Value functions for delayed rewards were found to be steeper than those for immediate rewards.
  • This steeper discounting of delayed rewards demonstrates the amount effect.
  • Direct judgment methods successfully revealed differences in value functions across delays.

Conclusions:

  • The amount effect in delay discounting is empirically supported by direct value judgments.
  • Value functions are demonstrably steeper for delayed rewards compared to immediate ones.
  • This finding unifies the understanding of the amount effect and delay-dependent value perception.