Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound Processor
Jace Wolfe1, Sara Neumann, Megan Marsh
1*Hearts for Hearing Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; †Speech and Hearing Department, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas; ‡Dallas Ear Institute, Dallas, Texas; §Houston Ear Research Foundation, Houston, Texas; ∥Cochlear Americas, Centennial, Colorado, U.S.A.; and ¶Cochlear Limited, Sydney, Australia.
Objective:
Cochlear implant recipients often experience difficulty understanding speech in noise. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the potential improvement in speech recognition in noise provided by an adaptive, commercially available sound processor that performs acoustic scene classification and automatically adjusts input signal processing to maximize performance in noise.
Research Design:
Within-subjects, repeated-measures design.
Setting:
This multicenter study was conducted across five sites in the U.S.A. and Australia.
Patients:
Ninety-three adults and children with Nucleus Freedom, CI422, and CI512 cochlear implants.
Intervention:
Subjects (previous users of the Nucleus 5 sound processor) were fitted with the Nucleus 6 sound processor. Performance was assessed while these subjects used each sound processor in the manufacturer's recommended default program (standard directionality, ASC + ADRO for the Nucleus 5 processor and ASC + ADRO and SNR-NR with SCAN for the Nucleus 6 sound processor). The subjects were also evaluated with the Nucleus 6 with standard directionality, ASC + ADRO and SNR-NR enabled but SCAN disabled.
Main Outcome Measures:
Speech recognition in noise was assessed with AzBio sentences.
Results:
Sentence recognition in noise was significantly better with the Nucleus 6 sound processor when used with the default input processing (ASC + ADRO, SNR-NR, and SCAN) compared to performance with the Nucleus 5 sound processor and default input processing (standard directionality, ASC + ADRO). Specifically, use of the Nucleus 6 at default settings resulted in a mean improvement in sentence recognition in noise of 27 percentage points relative to performance with the Nucleus 5 sound processor. Use of the Nucleus 6 sound processor using standard directionality, ASC + ADRO and SNR-NR (SCAN disabled) resulted in a mean improvement of 9 percentage points in sentence recognition in noise compared to performance with the Nucleus 5.
Conclusion:
The results of this study suggest that the Nucleus 6 sound processor with acoustic scene classification, automatic, adaptive directionality, and speech enhancement in noise processing provides significantly better speech recognition in noise when compared to performance with the Nucleus 5 processor.
Related Concept Videos
Hearing
The Cochlea
Auditory Pathway
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation

