Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

09:58
Using RNA-sequencing to Detect Novel Splice Variants Related to Drug Resistance in In Vitro Cancer Models
Published on: December 9, 2016
14.5K
Alternative splicing detection workflow needs a careful combination of sample prep and bioinformatics analysis
BMC Bioinformatics
|June 9, 2015
Summary
Library sample preparation and bioinformatics analysis significantly impact RNA-Seq splice variant detection. Low-input RNA methods and fewer reads reduce accuracy, with exon-level analysis showing slight advantages.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Molecular Biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is crucial for biomarker discovery and disease characterization.
- Library Sample Preparation (LSP) and Bioinformatics Analysis (BA) are critical steps influencing RNA-Seq outcomes.
- This study evaluates the combined impact of LSP methods and BA tools on splice variant detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess how different Library Sample Preparation (LSP) methods affect splice variant detection in RNA-Seq.
- To compare the performance of various Bioinformatics Analysis (BA) tools for detecting alternative splicing events.
- To determine the influence of input RNA quantity and sequencing depth on the accuracy of splice variant identification.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of multiple LSP protocols including TruSeq (unstranded/stranded), ScriptSeq, and NuGEN.
- Utilized a benchmark dataset with spiked-in synthetic and real RNA-Seq reads from standard and low-input libraries.
- Evaluated splice variant detection using quantification tools (Cuffdiff2, RSEM-EBSeq) and exon-level analysis (DEXSeq).
Main Results:
- All tested LSPs identified a common set of splice variants, but each also detected unique low-coverage transcripts.
- Low-input RNA protocols (NuGEN v2) showed a pronounced effect on unique transcript detection.
- Exon-level analysis (DEXSeq) slightly outperformed splice variant quantification (Cuffdiff2, RSEM-EBSeq), detecting up to 50% of spiked-in transcripts.
- Performance of both analysis types improved with increased sequencing read counts.
Conclusions:
- Low-input RNA data (NuGEN v2) is suboptimal for alternative splicing detection, particularly with exon-level analysis.
- The number of input reads critically influences the performance of both splice variant quantification and exon-level analyses.
- Ribosomal RNA depletion protocols exhibited lower sensitivity for detecting splice variants due to reads mapping to non-coding transcripts.
Related Concept Videos
Alternative RNA Splicing
27.1K
Alternative RNA splicing is the regulated splicing of exons and introns to produce different mature mRNAs from a single pre-mRNA. Unlike in constitutive splicing where a single gene produces a single type of mRNA, alternative splicing allows an organism to produce multiple proteins from a single gene and plays an important role in protein diversity.
There are five types of alternative RNA splicing that vary in the ways the pre-mRNA segments are removed or retained in the mature mRNA. The first...
There are five types of alternative RNA splicing that vary in the ways the pre-mRNA segments are removed or retained in the mature mRNA. The first...
27.1K
Alternative RNA Splicing
5.6K
5.6K
RNA Splicing
61.8K
Splicing is the process by which eukaryotic RNA is edited before its translation into protein. The RNA strand transcribed from eukaryotic DNA is called the primary transcript. The primary transcripts that become mRNAs are called precursor messenger RNAs (pre-mRNAs). Eukaryotic pre-mRNA contains alternating sequences of exons and introns. Exons are nucleotide sequences that code for proteins, whereas introns are the non-coding regions. In RNA splicing, introns are removed and exons are bonded...
61.8K
RNA Splicing
20.5K
20.5K
Pre-mRNA Processing: RNA Splicing
7.4K
7.4K
Pre-mRNA Processing
30.1K
30.1K

