Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

55.9K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
55.9K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

18.3K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
18.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.2K
Measurement of Blood Pressure01:17

Measurement of Blood Pressure

4.1K
Assessing blood pressure is a standard procedure executed in virtually all medical environments. The method utilized today was established over a hundred years ago by an innovative Russian doctor, Dr. Nikolai Korotkoff. The soft ticking noise, known as Korotkoff sounds, heard while taking blood pressure readings results from turbulent blood flow within the vessels. The apparatus required for this procedure includes a sphygmomanometer, a blood pressure cuff attached to a gauge, and a...
4.1K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

687
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
687

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing Lesion Segmentation via Medical Image-Mask Pair Synthesis using Phenotype-Conditioned Diffusion Models.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2026
Same author

Laboratory Test-Guided Medical Image Generation for Multi-Modal Disease Prediction.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same author

Polarity Prompting Vision Foundation Models for Pathology Image Analysis.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2025
Same author

Allosteric Feature Collaboration for Model-Heterogeneous Federated Learning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2023
Same author

Robust Remote Photoplethysmography Estimation With Environmental Noise Disentanglement.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2023
Same author

Local Style Transfer via Latent Space Manipulation for Cross-Disease Lesion Segmentation.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2023
Same journal

An Evolutionary Algorithm Assisted by an Ensemble of Pareto-Optimal Surrogate Models.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

A Quantum Self-Attention Neural Network Model on Quantum Circuits.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Semi-Explicit Solution of Some Discrete-Time Higher-Order-Cost Mean-Field-Type Control.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

A Novel One-Step Small Object Detector for Autonomous Aerial Vehicles.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Online Data-Driven-Based Optimal Output Tracking Control Without Initial Stabilizing Policy.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Digital Redesign-Based Interval State Estimation for Continuous Systems With Aperiodic Discrete Measurements.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy
11:15

Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy

Published on: June 27, 2013

34.5K

Entropy Measurement for Biometric Verification Systems.

Meng-Hui Lim, Pong C Yuen

    IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
    |June 9, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Biometric systems accept multiple measurements, but this lowers security. This study introduces a new entropy model to measure security degradation in biometric verification systems, ensuring user trust.

    More Related Videos

    P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
    06:09

    P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

    Published on: September 8, 2023

    1.0K
    Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
    09:18

    Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

    Published on: December 15, 2023

    3.7K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

    Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy
    11:15

    Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy

    Published on: June 27, 2013

    34.5K
    P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
    06:09

    P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

    Published on: September 8, 2023

    1.0K
    Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
    09:18

    Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

    Published on: December 15, 2023

    3.7K

    Area of Science:

    • Computer Science
    • Information Security
    • Biometrics

    Background:

    • Biometric verification systems permit multiple similar measurements per user to account for natural data variations.
    • Accepting multiple measurements enhances genuine user acceptance but compromises system security by lowering imposter difficulty.
    • Quantifying this security degradation is crucial for user assurance.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a novel entropy-measuring model for biometric systems that accommodate multiple similar measurements per user.
    • To quantify the security level of biometric systems in the presence of intrauser variations.
    • To provide a truthful security assurance to users of biometric verification systems.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed an entropy-measuring model based on the concept of guessing entropy.
    • Adapted the model to handle biometric systems accepting multiple similar measurements.
    • Quantified security by measuring adversarial guessing effort against two practical attack scenarios.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed model accurately quantifies biometric system security, even with multiple acceptable measurements.
    • Analytic results showed excellent agreement with experimental simulations on synthetic and benchmark face datasets.
    • Validated the correctness and feasibility of the entropy-measuring approach for biometric security.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed entropy model effectively measures security in biometric systems with multiple accepted measurements.
    • This approach provides a reliable method for assessing and assuring the security of biometric verification.
    • The findings support the practical application of entropy-based security measurement in biometrics.