Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Choosing covariates in the analysis of clinical trials
Abstract:
Much of the literature on clinical trials emphasizes the importance of adjusting the results for any covariates (baseline variables) for which randomization fails to produce nearly exact balance, but the literature is very nearly devoid of recipes for assessing the consequences of such adjustments. Several years ago, Paul Canner presented an approximate expression for the effect of a covariate adjustment, and he considered its use in the selection of covariates. With the aid of Canner's equation, using both formal analysis and simulation, the impact of covariate adjustment is further explored. Unless tight control over the analysis plans is established in advance, covariate adjustment can lead to seriously misleading inferences. Illustrations from the clinical trials literature are provided.
Related Concept Videos
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

