Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 9, 2026

09:12
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
73.2K
The Need for Experimental Methodology in Intimate Partner Violence: Finding Programs That Effectively Prevent IPV.
Lynette Feder1, Phyllis Holditch Niolon2, Jacquelyn Campbell3
1Portland State University, LFeder@pdx.edu.
Violence Against Women
|June 19, 2015
Summary
Rigorous evaluations of intimate partner violence (IPV) programs are crucial. A successful randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that researchers and practitioners can collaborate effectively to test IPV prevention interventions.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Social Sciences
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Limited rigorous evaluations hinder understanding of effective intimate partner violence (IPV) interventions.
- Ethical and safe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are feasible for evaluating IPV programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the successful implementation of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) for an IPV preventive intervention.
- To provide recommendations for successful researcher-practitioner collaboration in field experiments.
Main Methods:
- The Enhanced Nurse Family Partnership Study (ENFPS) utilized a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.
- Collaboration between researchers and practitioners was key to the study's implementation.
Main Results:
- The Enhanced Nurse Family Partnership Study (ENFPS) was successfully implemented as a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
- The study highlights the feasibility of ethically and safely evaluating IPV preventive interventions.
Conclusions:
- Successful collaboration between researchers and practitioners is essential for executing field experiments.
- The ENFPS model provides a framework for rigorously evaluating IPV interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Community Based Intervention
596
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
596
What is an Experiment?
19.8K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
19.8K
Study Designs in Epidemiology
1.6K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.6K
The Scientific Method
67.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
67.3K
Observational Studies
11.5K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
11.5K

