Related Experiment Videos
Alteration of retrieved implants in vitro by processing and infiltrating fluids
J Emmanual1, J G Emmanual, J B Koeneman
1Harrington Arthritis Research Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85006.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
|December 1, 1989
Summary
Histological processing fluids can alter biomaterials, potentially leading to misinterpretation. Spurr's and GMA fluids showed no adverse effects on common prosthetic biomaterials during testing.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Histology
- Prosthetics Research
Background:
- Undecalcified histology is crucial for analyzing the prosthesis-bone interface.
- Histological preparation requires dehydrating, clearing, and plastic infiltrating fluids.
- Potential for processing fluids to induce artifacts in biomaterials exists.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if common histological processing fluids alter biomaterials.
- To determine if such alterations could be misinterpreted as in vivo changes.
- To identify processing fluids that do not affect biomaterial integrity.
Main Methods:
- Eleven common prosthetic biomaterials were exposed to ten different histological fluids.
- Non-metal biomaterials were incubated in fluids at room temperature for 5 days.
- Biomaterials and fluid-centrifuged pellets were examined daily and post-incubation using polarized light microscopy.
Main Results:
- Polysulfone and bone cement showed significant alterations in vitro with most tested fluids.
- Plasticizer and catalyst components in some fluids induced changes in biomaterials.
- Spurr's and GMA fluids did not cause any observable alterations in any tested biomaterials.
Conclusions:
- Certain histological processing fluids can induce artifacts in biomaterials like polysulfone and bone cement.
- Careful selection of processing fluids is necessary to avoid misinterpreting in vitro alterations as in vivo changes.
- Spurr's and GMA are recommended as safe processing fluids for these biomaterials in histological analysis.