Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
Published on: January 31, 2014
Search for efficient complete and planned missing data designs for analysis of change
Wei Wu1, Fan Jia2, Mijke Rhemtulla3
1Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, KS, 66044, USA. wwei@ku.edu.
This study introduces SEEDMC, a method for finding efficient longitudinal data collection designs, including complete data (CD) and planned missing (PM) designs. SEEDMC optimizes study efficiency and cost under budget constraints for growth-curve modeling.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Longitudinal Data Analysis
- Research Design
Background:
- Longitudinal data collection is crucial for studying change over time.
- Efficient study designs maximize statistical power and minimize resource expenditure.
- Complete data (CD) and planned missing (PM) designs are common approaches for longitudinal data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose SEEDMC (Search for Efficient Designs using Monte Carlo Simulation), a systematic procedure for identifying efficient longitudinal data collection designs.
- To enable the search for efficient complete data (CD) and planned missing (PM) designs tailored for growth-curve modeling within budget limitations.
- To develop designs robust to missing data due to attrition, specifically under the Missing Completely At Random (MCAR) assumption.
Main Methods:
- SEEDMC utilizes Monte Carlo simulation to systematically explore various longitudinal designs.
- The procedure allows for the identification of efficient designs for single or multiple effects simultaneously.
- Application focuses on linear and quadratic growth models to find efficient designs for key change parameters.
Main Results:
- SEEDMC successfully identified efficient complete data (CD) and planned missing (PM) designs for growth-curve modeling.
- The procedure demonstrated flexibility in optimizing designs for specific effects and robustness against MCAR attrition.
- Efficient designs were determined for key parameters in both linear and quadratic growth models.
Conclusions:
- SEEDMC provides a flexible and systematic approach for optimizing longitudinal study designs under budget constraints.
- The method aids researchers in selecting efficient designs that balance statistical power, cost, and missing data robustness.
- Future extensions of SEEDMC could incorporate more complex growth models and different missing data mechanisms.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Censoring Survival Data
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

