Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

1.8K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
1.8K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.8K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.8K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.3K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.3K
False Memories01:18

False Memories

654
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
654
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

693
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
693
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.5K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Normative data for an expanded set of stimuli for testing high-level influences on object perception: OMEFA-II.

PloS one·2020
Same author

Neural Signatures of the Configural Superiority Effect and Fundamental Emergent Features in Human Vision.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

The experience error and the perils of psychopsychology.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2015
Same author

A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations.

Psychological bulletin·2012
Same author

Grouping and emergent features in vision: toward a theory of basic Gestalts.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2011
Same author

Where similarity beats redundancy: the importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2008

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Detection of Tissue-resident Bacteria in Bladder Biopsies by 16S rRNA Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
09:50

Detection of Tissue-resident Bacteria in Bladder Biopsies by 16S rRNA Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

Published on: October 18, 2019

10.4K

False pop out.

Kimberley D Orsten-Hooge1, Mary C Portillo2, James R Pomerantz1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Rice University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|July 28, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Visual search typically features a unique target popping out. However, a new phenomenon called "false pop out" shows distractors can also emerge, challenging existing visual attention theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual search involves identifying a target among distractors.
  • The phenomenon of 'pop out' describes rapid target detection.
  • Existing theories focus on unique targets dominating visual search.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and define the phenomenon of 'false pop out'.
  • To investigate how distractors can compete with targets in visual search.
  • To explore the implications of false pop out for theories of visual attention.

Main Methods:

  • Presenting visual search displays with homogenous distractors and a singleton target.
  • Utilizing multiple stimulus types to test the robustness of the phenomenon.
  • Analyzing search behavior to identify instances of false pop out.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Rapid Detection of Respiratory Pathogens Using Microfluidic Chip
06:11

Author Spotlight: Advancing Rapid Detection of Respiratory Pathogens Using Microfluidic Chip

Published on: March 29, 2024

2.8K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Detection of Tissue-resident Bacteria in Bladder Biopsies by 16S rRNA Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
09:50

Detection of Tissue-resident Bacteria in Bladder Biopsies by 16S rRNA Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

Published on: October 18, 2019

10.4K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Rapid Detection of Respiratory Pathogens Using Microfluidic Chip
06:11

Author Spotlight: Advancing Rapid Detection of Respiratory Pathogens Using Microfluidic Chip

Published on: March 29, 2024

2.8K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.1K

Main Results:

  • A novel phenomenon, 'false pop out,' was identified.
  • Homogenous distractors were observed to compete with singleton targets for attentional capture.
  • The effect was demonstrated across different types of visual stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • False pop out challenges traditional models of visual search and attention.
  • Distractor elements can disrupt expected attentional guidance.
  • Further research is needed to refine theories of visual search and feature integration.