Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

59.3K
Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced...
59.3K
CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

18.9K
18.9K
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing01:28

CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

2.7K
The CRISPR-Cas system serves as a bacterial defense mechanism against invading genetic elements such as viruses and plasmids, forming the foundation for its adaptation as a powerful genome-editing tool. Originally discovered in prokaryotes, this system has been repurposed to revolutionize genetic engineering across a wide range of organisms, including plants, animals, and humans. The core component, Cas9, is an endonuclease derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, capable of introducing...
2.7K
CRISPR and crRNAs02:53

CRISPR and crRNAs

19.6K
Bacteria and archaea are susceptible to viral infections just like eukaryotes; therefore, they have developed a unique adaptive immune system to protect themselves. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) are present in more than 45% of known bacteria and 90% of known archaea.
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
19.6K
What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

81.5K
Overview
81.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biophysical Characterization of Ebola VP35 Protein Binding to Host Mindbomb Protein 2.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same author

Living with one: Mental health, body image and fertility concerns after orchiectomy for testicular torsion.

Journal of pediatric urology·2026
Same author

Time-Resolved Neutron Imaging for Hydrogen Uptake in Subsurface Lithologies.

Environmental science & technology letters·2026
Same author

Thermo-chemical conversion of PET-based plastic wastes to activated carbons: role in supercapacitors in aqueous and organic electrolytes.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

The bactericidal FabI inhibitor Debio 1453 clears antibiotic-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in vivo.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Degeneration affects the structure-function relationship of the human meniscus.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2025

Related Experiment Videos

Bacterial scissors to edit human embryos?

Michael Gross

    Current Biology : CB
    |August 1, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A new gene editing tool allows precise human gene modification, including in the germline. This rapid advancement outpaces ethical discussions, raising significant bioethical concerns.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Area of Science:

    • Genetics
    • Bioethics
    • Molecular Biology

    Background:

    • Gene editing technologies offer unprecedented precision in modifying DNA.
    • The potential for germline gene editing presents unique ethical challenges.
    • Recent technological advancements are outpacing the ethical discourse.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the implications of a novel gene editing tool.
    • To examine the ethical considerations surrounding germline gene editing.
    • To assess the current state of bioethical debate in light of new technology.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of recent gene editing tool discoveries.
    • Analysis of ethical frameworks for human gene modification.
    • Discussion of the pace of technological advancement versus ethical deliberation.

    Main Results:

    • A newly discovered gene editing tool enables precise targeting of human genes.
    • Germline gene editing is now a tangible possibility.
    • The ethical debate has not kept pace with technological capabilities.

    Conclusions:

    • The rapid development of gene editing tools necessitates urgent ethical reevaluation.
    • The potential for germline modification opens a complex 'Pandora's box' for bioethics.
    • Proactive ethical guidelines are crucial to navigate the future of gene editing.