Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Azimuths and Bearings01:19

Azimuths and Bearings

933
Azimuths and bearings are essential concepts in surveying, providing methods to express the direction of a line relative to a meridian. Azimuths refer to the clockwise angle measured from the north end of a reference meridian to the given line, ranging from zero to 360 degrees. This method gives a comprehensive directional reference within a full 360-degree circle, making it a straightforward way to communicate direction in various fields, including navigation, cartography, and...
933
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

844
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
844
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

612
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
612
Differential Leveling01:12

Differential Leveling

895
Differential leveling is a precise method in surveying used to determine the elevation difference between two points. Its primary goal is to establish accurate vertical measurements to create level surfaces or grade lines critical for designing and constructing infrastructures such as roads, bridges, and buildings.The procedure for differential leveling begins with setting up and leveling the instrument at a point where the benchmark can be seen. The level rod is held on the benchmark (BM), and...
895
Gyroscope: Precession01:24

Gyroscope: Precession

6.0K
Precession can be demonstrated effectively through a spinning top. If a spinning top is placed on a flat surface near the surface of the Earth at a vertical angle and is not spinning, it will fall over due to the force of gravity producing a torque acting on its center of mass. However, if the top is spinning on its axis, it precesses about the vertical direction, rather than topple over due to this torque. Precessional motion is a combination of a steady circular motion of the axis and the...
6.0K
Sight Distance in a Vertical Curve01:29

Sight Distance in a Vertical Curve

489
Sight distance on vertical curves is critical in roadway design. It ensures drivers can see far enough ahead to identify and respond to hazards effectively. This directly impacts safety, driver comfort, and the overall efficiency of the transportation network.Vertical curves are classified into crest and sag curves based on their geometry. For crest curves, sight distance is determined by the line of sight between a driver's eye and a small object on the road's surface. Design parameters for...
489

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comprehensive Evaluation of Explanation Types in a Spaceflight-Relevant Human-Autonomy Teaming Task.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Information-State-Based Reinforcement Learning for the Control of Partially Observed Nonlinear Systems.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2025
Same author

Navigation between initial and desired community states using shortcuts.

Ecology letters·2023
Same author

Generalized sampling-based motion planners.

IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics : a publication of the IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society·2011
Same journal

An Evolutionary Algorithm Assisted by an Ensemble of Pareto-Optimal Surrogate Models.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

A Quantum Self-Attention Neural Network Model on Quantum Circuits.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Semi-Explicit Solution of Some Discrete-Time Higher-Order-Cost Mean-Field-Type Control.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

A Novel One-Step Small Object Detector for Autonomous Aerial Vehicles.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Online Data-Driven-Based Optimal Output Tracking Control Without Initial Stabilizing Policy.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Digital Redesign-Based Interval State Estimation for Continuous Systems With Aperiodic Discrete Measurements.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform
06:25

Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform

Published on: February 12, 2014

8.9K

Information Space Receding Horizon Control for Multisensor Tasking Problems.

Zachary Sunberg, Suman Chakravorty, Richard Scott Erwin

    IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
    |August 11, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a receding horizon method for optimal sensor scheduling to track multiple targets, enhancing space situational awareness (SSA). The novel approach makes complex multiagent problems computationally tractable for improved monitoring.

    More Related Videos

    Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
    07:48

    Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

    Published on: April 4, 2025

    1.5K
    An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
    09:27

    An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

    Published on: August 25, 2020

    4.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

    Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform
    06:25

    Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform

    Published on: February 12, 2014

    8.9K
    Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
    07:48

    Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

    Published on: April 4, 2025

    1.5K
    An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
    09:27

    An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

    Published on: August 25, 2020

    4.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Robotics and Control Systems
    • Operations Research
    • Aerospace Engineering

    Background:

    • Optimal sensor scheduling is crucial for effective monitoring of dynamic targets.
    • The space situational awareness (SSA) problem necessitates efficient multi-sensor coordination.
    • Existing dynamic programming solutions for multiagent Markov decision processes are computationally intractable for complex scenarios.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a computationally tractable solution for optimal multi-sensor scheduling.
    • To address the challenges of monitoring dynamical targets in space situational awareness.
    • To present a receding horizon approach combined with stochastic optimization for sensor scheduling.

    Main Methods:

    • A simulation-based stochastic optimization technique is employed for variance reduction and distributed solutions.
    • The core problem is framed as a multiagent Markov decision process on the information space.
    • A receding horizon strategy is integrated to solve control problems online, avoiding intractable dynamic programming.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed technique successfully addresses the optimal sensor scheduling problem.
    • The receding horizon approach combined with stochastic optimization yields a computationally tractable solution.
    • The method was validated on a moderate-scale SSA example that is intractable for existing techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed receding horizon solution offers a computationally feasible method for optimal multi-sensor scheduling.
    • This approach significantly advances the ability to manage sensor resources for space situational awareness.
    • The technique provides a practical solution for complex, large-scale multiagent monitoring problems.