Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Squaring the circle: a priority-setting method for evidence-based service development, reconciling research with
Rebecca Hutten1, Glenys D Parry2, Thomas Ricketts3,4
1School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. r.hutten@sheffield.ac.uk.
This study presents a novel method for implementing research findings in long-term depression care. It successfully integrated diverse evidence and stakeholder input to prioritize service improvements, meeting competing requirements effectively.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Mental Health Policy
- Implementation Science
Background:
- Implementing research findings into practice for long-term conditions like depression faces challenges.
- Policy requires innovations to be cost-effective, evidence-based, and guideline-compliant.
- Service development must balance clinician/service user needs with resource limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate a novel technique for implementing research findings in longer-term depression care.
- To reconcile competing requirements in service development by integrating diverse evidence and stakeholder views.
- To improve services and self-management for individuals with long-term depression.
Main Methods:
- Combined mathematical modeling of care pathways with research evidence and qualitative findings.
- Utilized a series of workshops for defining, refining, and selecting service improvements.
- Employed structured discussion and anonymized electronic voting in a consensus-generating workshop, followed by an email survey.
Main Results:
- An initial list of over 20 ideas was refined into four main areas.
- A final workshop with 40 stakeholders from diverse groups (service users, clinicians, managers, commissioners, researchers) reached consensus on seven ideas.
- A subsequent survey confirmed the top six ideas for practical testing.
Conclusions:
- The method successfully engaged diverse stakeholders and integrated various evidence sources.
- It facilitated convergence towards research-informed priorities for service improvement.
- The approach effectively addressed competing requirements, yielding practical priorities for service enhancement.
Related Concept Videos
Persuasion Strategies
Ethical Dilemmas II
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:

