Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026
Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024
Intrahepatic Activity Distribution in Radioembolization with Yttrium-90-Labeled Resin Microspheres Using the Body
Oliver S Grosser1, Gerhard Ulrich1, Christian Furth1
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany.
Purpose:
To retrospectively assess the influence of the parameters of the body surface area (BSA) method in hepatic radioembolization using yttrium-90-labeled microspheres on the determination of the prescribed activity.
Materials And Methods:
Data from 283 consecutive patients treated with radioembolization (BSA method) were included. For interindividual comparisons, activity concentrations (ACs; MBq/mL) were calculated for each liver. The impact of the BSA method parameters was assessed by analysis of variance and pairwise t test with Bonferroni-Holm correction.
Results:
Prescribed activity was 1.01-2.71 GBq, with BSA, liver volume (LV), tumor burden, and the liver-lung shunt reduction factor (LLS RF) being significant contributing factors to the AC (all P < .0001, analysis of variance). BSA and LV correlated only moderately (ρ = 0.46, P < .0001). Compared with base activity defined by the BSA (median = 1.67 GBq; range, 1.20-2.32 GBq), the activity contribution of tumor burden was small (median = 150 MBq; range, 3-800 MBq). Resulting activities were reduced according to LLS RF by 20% in 12.4% and by 40% in 3.5% of patients. AC was significantly (up to 56%) lower in association with larger LV than in small LV (LV < 1,500 mL vs ≥ 2,500 mL, P < .0001).
Conclusions:
In the BSA model, BSA and LV showed only a moderate correlation, resulting in a significantly lower AC in patients with larger livers. Tumor burden percentage contributed little to the prescribed activity because the BSA model did not account for actual LVs and tumor volumes. These inaccuracies may potentially result in underdosage in patients with larger livers, especially if further LLS RF needs to be applied.
